RE:@imran
by imran patel on Dec 11, 2007 10:10 PM Permalink
Lets define "India" from an historic perspective...
My correction. I should have said "SINDH" that includes parts of Afganistan and Pakistan.
Islam was introduced to the south-east in 629AD.
During the period of early Rajput supremacy in north India, during the seventh, the first Muslim invasions were carried out simultaneously with the expansion towards Central Asia. In 664, forces led by Mohalib began launching raids from Persia, striking Multan in the southern Punjab in what is today Pakistan.
In 711, an expedition led by Muhammad bin Qasim defeated Raja Dahir at what is now Hyderabad in Sindh and established Umayyad rule by 712. Qasim subdued the whole of what is modern Pakistan, from Karachi to Kashmir, reaching the borders of Kashmir within three years. After his recall, however, the region devolved into the semi-independent Arab ruled states of Mansura and Multan
RE:@imran
by Verghese on Dec 11, 2007 10:26 PM Permalink
Thank the British We are one..Even at the time of partition India was more than 500 princely state..
RE:@imran
by James Baker on Dec 11, 2007 11:49 PM Permalink
verghese..Why don't ask this question to your pedohile priest...Converted christians in Keral are making a mockery of democracy and you are praising the British. You read British History, they say they saved India and brought civilazation to savavges..You believed them and converted. right??Wrong..Open your eyes and know your own rich history of Keral..There was so much culture and tradition there..Now what you got..beef eating converted christians..trying to break into Ayyapa temple..shame on you mann..
