Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
Message deleted by moderator.    Hide replies
Message deleted by moderator
  RE:For sake of Argument
by Movie Subscription on Dec 11, 2007 03:08 PM   Permalink
ittati kha lae

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
  RE:For sake of Argument
by Ram Chauthariya on Dec 11, 2007 03:12 PM   Permalink
Yes even with daily terror attacks on civilians all over the world

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
  RE:For sake of Argument
by Movie Subscription on Dec 11, 2007 03:15 PM   Permalink
t.At.ti kha lae

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:For sake of Argument
by Ram Chauthariya on Dec 11, 2007 03:16 PM   Permalink
Why then Muslims need to have 50 exclusive Islamic states? If you are humanity, then all Islamic countries should have been secular nations who respect all of humanity? How about Saudi Arabia- birthplace of Mohamed?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:For sake of Argument
by Wahaj Faridy on Dec 11, 2007 03:22 PM   Permalink
50 muslim countries will unite as one within year should extenal meddling into their affairs by way of stoogeocracy, or dealocarcy end from WEST's side

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:For sake of Argument
by Ram Chauthariya on Dec 11, 2007 03:30 PM   Permalink
Here comes the real Muslim outside of you. Stop the talk of humanity and think more in terms of land grabbing, making Islam the dominant religion at any cost ....

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:For sake of Argument
by Avinash on Dec 11, 2007 03:08 PM   Permalink
Mr.Wahaj Faridy, pl read some more history. We are not fools to believe in whatever you say. Btw we have no objection if you want to treat the atrocities committed by the Islamic invaders as an honour to your ancestors. But don't try to foce your religion on anybody else!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:For sake of Argument
by Wahaj Faridy on Dec 11, 2007 03:15 PM   Permalink
Avinash, I agreed just for a moment for sake of argument only.

I have read lots of History, and I know that All your stories of attrocities on Hindu Masses are figment of imagination.

Problem is that you treat Hindu King as sacred, and Muslim King as Evil. But I treat both as curse on humanity. Islam was first religion which challnged this curse, and chased them away in great measure. However, eventually, Kings pevailed and estabilshed themselves back. Masses like you keep crying 'My King vs foreign king, but Kings were only attcahed to wealth, not people...any king, home grown, or foreign invader

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:For sake of Argument
by Avinash on Dec 11, 2007 03:21 PM   Permalink
Wahaj Faridy, all those things happend in an era where "might was right" we are now living in a democratic country (forget about Islamic countries - we are not interested in them). So let us all jettison the religious dogmas and belive in neo-humanism. If you want to worship a different God (Allah), it is your choice but limit to the four walls of your house or your place or worship. Let others also do the same thing. That is the only way to peace and prosperity.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:For sake of Argument
by Wahaj Faridy on Dec 11, 2007 03:28 PM   Permalink
No modern country preaches following that Islam Preaches:

0. All humans are brothers ans sisters, created by one creator

1. No East No West Only one Humanity behind Is creator

2. No Borders, No Passports..only one unified world

3. No taxation (legalized extortion) beyond 2.5%

THAT IS WHY ISLAM IS BETTER THAN ANY OTHER MODERN PHILOSOPHY

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:For sake of Argument
by Avinash on Dec 11, 2007 03:37 PM   Permalink
Mr.Wahaj Faridy, can you visit Saudi Arabia even for Haj or Umrah without a Passport? Whom are you trying to fool?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
Pakistan tests 700-km Babar missile