RE:britain responsible for partition of india
by avinash kanodia on Dec 10, 2007 04:53 PM Permalink
"partition of India"? Can you tell who ruled India before british came? The british actually united India, which was nener a country before, never under one rule, as atleast for the last 2000 years, it was always divided, several hundred kings and kingdoms such as nepal and bhutan of today. We would not have been different from these countries. Worse, the largest portion under muslim rule and with a few more aurengzabes, the entire north indian population could be muslim. Not your fault, the govt's (Cong-I)historians to blame who give a wrong perspective in books. "We were always divided, we are "Nobody can divide us more.
RE:britain responsible for partition of india
by Vishal Nanda on Dec 10, 2007 06:53 PM Permalink
You are the BIGGEST idiot who opens his mouth without knowing the facts. A moslem or a Pseudo with a Hindu name.
MYTH 1 - BRITISH UNITED INDIA -----------------------------
FACT 1 - THe first to unite India was a shepherd King under the guidance of the best politician of the globe till date. He was none other than Chandragupta Maurya the beginer of the Maurya dynasty. His reign extended from Magadha the current day Bihar and parts of WB till the tip in the Deccan and the north beyond Afghanistan.
Fact 2 ------
After Chandragupta post British, it was Sardar Patel who took all the Kingdoms and formed the present Union unlike Gandhi the legitimate father of the ILLEGITIMATE PAKISTAN.
Dont utter suck nonsense amongst5 your friends or u will become the laughing stock of your group.
RE:RE:britain responsible for partition of india
by avinash kanodia on Dec 10, 2007 09:39 PM Permalink
Again foul language whick speaks loads of your personality. In the last 2000 years, for what length of time was India one country. Do not boast of things which were more conceptual rather than practical. British have nothing to do with Chandragupta, speak of political situation when they arrived. You have conviniently forgotton "India independence act" passed by British Parliament and 2-nation theory. You would probably have been better off under muslims.
RE:RE:RE:britain responsible for partition of india
by avinash kanodia on Dec 10, 2007 09:41 PM Permalink
And by the way, the British did a mistake by not dividing India properly and listening to Gandhi who was bent upon making India a "secular" state. Had India been divided properly, there would have been less problems today! An undivided India would have had much more serious problems than today.
RE:RE:britain responsible for partition of india
by Rajagopal Sadagopan on Dec 10, 2007 07:27 PM Permalink
And Bharath i.e. India was a single country from Myanmar's boundry in the east, Afghkanistan in the west, Himalayas in the north and Indian Ocean in the South. This may not be political one, but defenitely cultural with common heritage. All, we Indians, must be very proud of this great history and tradition instead of feeling insecure.
Whether one beliefs or not, Ramayanam and Mahabharatham clearly established this irrefutable facts. In Ramayanan, Seetha was a daughter of a ruler west of Sind. In Mahabharatham, all the kings, cheiftains and rulers were part of the epic war. They are clearly documented in the descriptions causing little doubt, various rulers from Dravidam, Assam, Indukush. Himalays were allighning eith with Khauvaravas or Pandavas.
Moghuls, under Babar who was from west of Afghanistan, had invaded India, that was Bharath at that time. It was only due to fighting between the cousins ruling the various political states, they, were able to get to rule us. The britishers who had rewritten Indian history, had christined as India, meaning as the country east of Sind river.
Then, this being an historical fact, let us all unite irrespective of languages, religions and other dividing forces like Congress.
RE:britain responsible for partition of india
by Sathish N on Dec 10, 2007 04:59 PM Permalink
What a silly argument. If someone where to invade all of europe, does it make it ok since it is not one country but multiple countries. You must be a born slave.
RE:RE:britain responsible for partition of india
by avinash kanodia on Dec 10, 2007 05:13 PM Permalink
I have replied only to the argument where we have begun, that british divided India. Anyway, perhaps people like you are impatient, not seeing the context in which something is said and start abusing as if it is your birth right.
