Modi is correct in his reply. Ms Soniaji started campaign with reviving issue of Godhra happened before 5 yrs. otherwise campaign was on development issues. She started saying Maut ke Saudagar. She has forgotten that in Godhra Ramsevaks were killed brutally in Railway. It is completely ignored.
Then who was sohrabuddin? Why Sonia Gandhi should take his side? Was he deshbhakt or gunda? We are paying Rs. 75 to Banasingh who is paramveer and allowing terrorists with Biryani and money.
News papers now a days play politics and dont send news. create hallabol on certain people. especially against hindus. It is required to searched by lifting their veil whether they are funded by govt., muslim countries, chinese govt, christians. because news papers are holy cows they are taking misadvantage out of it.
If modi is maut ke saudagar then what Buddhdeb is who is allowing partyworkers to do halla in nandigram.
Who is Karunanidhi who dare to doubt Lord Rama? Who is MF Husain, Who paints hindu goddesses in nude? If they are correct in their views then Modi is correct.
Otherwise they should also get punished? What kuldip nayyar and Mr Khushwantsingh writes only to appease muslims and creating havoc about hindu terrorism which is not there in the first place.
Actually hindus are g**dus hence they allow these people to reign. Hindus should behave like muslims !
RE:Modi's speech
by joginder on Dec 09, 2007 01:59 PM Permalink
Actually................hence, Mr Gokhale No body asking here you family history be prompt on issue, so that ppls understand your view not faimly history, Shiv Sena chief is socalled Hindu he might be same, Manohar joshi, Advani , Atal , Modi they are all hindu mind it, If you are talking about Mahashtrain we are very much agree, as they cannot survive out side maharashtra
RE:Modi's speech
by Tushar Sakhalkar on Dec 09, 2007 02:47 PM Permalink
Maharashtra i scapable of feeding ALL its own people. We do not neeed to EXPORT people to other states.
