congress from its so-called glorious days of gandhi and nehru has never done anything to protect the hindus, the natives of the indian subcontinent. these two gentlemen accelerated india's partition so that nehru can become pm. if subhash bose, sardar patel and lal bahadur shasti had been alive, we would have seen a very different india today. history says nehru was a big hypocrite, nothing can be truer than that. gandhi was at least honest in confessing his blunders but extremely unfortunately he was after subhash bose only for motilal and jawaharlal nehru. subhash bose gave a radio broadcast to the indians on berlin radio, he addressed his speech to gandhi by calling him "the father of the nation", thats how we came to address gandhi as "bapuji". bapuji's idiosyncracies made life miserable for subhash, cr das, and later on others suffered like shyama prasad mukherjee. today we talk about secularism, has anyone seen 1946 calcutta riots coming out of sirrabardi's call for "direct action". isnt gandhi and congress responsible for the murder of millions of hindus by the muslims, what has congress done to eradicate this problem other than aggravating it. what happened to the complete population transfer as one of the negotiation points for the british leaving a divided and devastated india. congress has every reason to stop calling itself a national party. and please do not vote for congress.
RE:congresss& hindus
by sss on Dec 09, 2007 12:16 PM Permalink
Sugata Chatterjee well said ..u have written the truth which all these morons dont know,they are not bothered about what has happened in the past.These suedo secularists are not aware of what had happened in Bengal in 1947 ..at least thanks some people know this
RE:congresss& hindus
by Sunil Dharam on Dec 09, 2007 12:12 PM Permalink
Gandhi was against any form of voilence, gandhi was never responsible for any riots. Riots were handywork of Muslim fundamentalists & Hindu fundamentalists, infact Gandhi himself was a victim of such a terrorist act & paid the ultimate price. The very fact that Subash Chandra Bose also refered to him as father of the nation shows the high regard he had for gandhiji.
RE:congresss& hindus
by sugata chatterjee on Dec 09, 2007 12:23 PM Permalink
gandhi stopped anti british movement and asked every indian to join the khilafat movement. is gandhi born in baghdad ?
RE:congresss& hindus
by sugata chatterjee on Dec 09, 2007 12:02 PM Permalink
please, either rediff or some noble hearted secularist should report it for abuse.
RE:congresss& hindus
by Anurag Shrivastava on Dec 09, 2007 12:07 PM Permalink
subhash bose, sardar patel and lal bahadur shasti had been alive, we would have seen a very different india today >>> yup - divided into 100 pieces thanks to their foolish way to upset minorities or those who opposed their ideology. Sastry was a decent guy ( he happens to my distant relative ) but not very strong.
RE:RE:congresss& hindus
by akshay foru on Dec 09, 2007 01:24 PM Permalink
haha just becoz he was ur door ka relative .. I am sure sonia is also ur relative door ki ... or madmohan singh ur long lost uncle ... india 200 saal se jyada britishers ka ghulam tha ... 50 saal congress ka aur aage aur 100-200 saal italians ka ghulaam rahega
RE:congresss& hindus
by Star on Dec 09, 2007 12:04 PM Permalink
So what do u expect from BJP also..?? In India it is natural to expect that innocent people would be killed. In the last fifteen years Hindu nationalists have gone looking for excuses to massacre Muslims. Now given this provocation it was obvious to all that there would be a blood bath.
