..while answering to the sickening nonsensical charges of communalised sanghis.
the sanghis have no business differentiating victims and perptrators on the basis of religious identity. they also have no rights to impose their stupid communal worldview on others.
i can see victims as victims and criminals after criminals without any considerration of their birth identity.
why should a person's birth identity matter for ensuring justice and fairplay?
these screwed up idiots demand we pay attention to people belonging to particular community while condoning/supporting crimes perptrated on a community they don't like/hate. That's plain sick and disgusting.
and not to forget these same gang are supporters of a bigoted uncivlzed party and a mass murderer.
supporters of a mass murderer talking about humanitarian issues? how shameless and low can one get than this !
RE:yagnik is naive like so many liberals..,.
by shainav gupta on Dec 07, 2007 03:00 AM Permalink
Mr Satya S, am not a BJP supporter and nor a Congress one, neither from Gujarat. But honestly one thing, dont you think this guy is highky biased in his replies??? Specially where he talk of Soniaji being a Gujarati Parsi bahu n stuff...(unless he begging for caste based votes...the same Congress vote-bank plank)???? Be honest in whatever u answer... and dont u think that a site like rediff should remove this interview immediately as it will further ignite communal hatred as we can witness from the replies on the messageboard???
RE:RE:yagnik is naive like so many liberals..,.
by satya s on Dec 07, 2007 03:12 AM Permalink
I have read yagnik's views for 17 years by now .i first read him when he wrote columns for the hindu now and then. i am neither his greatest fan or critic.on some views i agree with him .sometimes i don't.that's the way it has always been.
no i don't think he incites hatred.
only communalists and bigots are responsible for communal hatred. its that simple. only a fool blames others for his own vice and faults!
RE:RE:yagnik is naive like so many liberals..,.
by satya s on Dec 07, 2007 03:19 AM Permalink
"But honestly one thing, dont you think this guy is highky biased in his replies???"
Leave alone yagnik,....can i produce articles from nonindians indicting the sangh gang ? just think why decent scholars and commnetators around the world don't think of the RSS positively.
you first dwelve why a politcal party that follows a ideology of hate and incites communal campaigns and riots in the 21st century would get positive publicity in the first place ?
RE:yagnik is naive like so many liberals..,.
by Nilesh on Dec 07, 2007 04:16 AM Permalink
The so called "decent scholars" have been adjudged decent by you only. As far as i see, there is peace in Gujrat, there are no communal riots. Dont you see that ? But there are communal tensions everywhere else. Is there any curb on the civil rights of minority in Gujrat ? Then why are trying to potray the opinions of decent scholars. You talk about your opinion sir. And RSS, BJP are important. We cant close our eyes towards what going on.
RE:RE:RE:yagnik is naive like so many liberals..,.
by shainav gupta on Dec 07, 2007 03:27 AM Permalink
Thanks for your reply. Hindu not popular in North so dont know Yagnik much. But this interview I cant call liberal & sane voice. To me, he is pro-Congress from his replies and a site like Rediff should refrain publishing such interviews. On reading his answers, people will obviously get more pro-Modi rather than being Anti one. First why he is so quiet on Kashmiri pandits, nandigram, Taslima nasreen, 1984 n stuff. Secondly Soniaji being reduced from INDIAN to Gujarati Paarsi bahu.I hope you support me on this.
