I had not seen anybody who opposing MODI ready to comment on Shahi Imam's fatwa against VANDE MATARAM and Rajiv Gandhis involvement in Killing of Sikhs in 1984?
Why the partiality. Why we try to find mistake in specific persons, Why cant we condemn anything which is against national interest and unity irrespective of the region,religion of the person who did it.?
The attitude to be impartial is what we need int his forum. Muslims targetting HIndu leader, Hindu targetting Muslim Leaders wont solve the problem. let everybody condemn who ever work against national interest
RE:RE:Why the attitude of partiality
by Chethil Sudheesh on Dec 05, 2007 06:40 PM Permalink
past is past. live in present. You didn't have guts to oppose Shahi Imam/Rajiv Gandhi. Because you didn't raise voice against something in the past doesn't mean that you should keep your mouth always shut.
RE:Why the attitude of partiality
by varun shrivastava on Dec 05, 2007 06:44 PM Permalink
Agreed with the first line dear. I don't say we should keep mum on things but why after 5 years or 25 we are reviving the ghost. Let the development of state be the key point.
RE:Why the attitude of partiality
by Chethil Sudheesh on Dec 05, 2007 06:47 PM Permalink
Now I am reacting against modi's speech (if it is correct). Not against godhra/riot. A CM should not be speaking like this. there is a law in this land. CM should not make fake encounter to kill any terrorist.
RE:Why the attitude of partiality
by varun prakash shrivastava on Dec 05, 2007 06:39 PM Permalink
If people are allowed to debate 5 year old case then they should debate the case which is nearly 25 years old.
