Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
NANDIGRAM & WEST BENGAL
by Amitabha Mukhopadhyay on Dec 04, 2007 04:38 PM   Permalink | Hide replies

WEST BENGAL IS EMERGING, INDUSTRIALIZATION PROCESS IS ON. SO, ALL AGAINST BENGAL ARE OPPOSING TO THIS. SAME TRUE FOR MAMATA & SO CALLED INTTELCTUALS, WHO DON'T KNOW RURAL BENGAL, EVEN URBAN BENGAL. THANKS TO BUDDHA, NIRUPAM & THEIR TEAM.
-AMITABHA

    Forward  |  Report abuse
  RE:RE:NANDIGRAM & WEST BENGAL
by Tamal Das on Dec 04, 2007 05:05 PM   Permalink
One CM destroy the Industry and other damaging the agriculture of WB. All the Commie are destroyer

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:NANDIGRAM & WEST BENGAL
by Narwekar on Dec 04, 2007 04:49 PM   Permalink
Bengal can never become an industrial state. Thanks for idiotic people like you and your Communist parties.
Once I tried to put up a factory there. The conditions put up by so called server of poor people (for their own benefits and by the local party mafia) made me to run away from eastern india itself.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:NANDIGRAM & WEST BENGAL
by Tamal Das on Dec 04, 2007 05:04 PM   Permalink
One CM destroy the Industry and other damaging the agriculture of WB. All the Commie are destroyer

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:NANDIGRAM & WEST BENGAL
by shaji tabor on Dec 04, 2007 04:45 PM   Permalink
Blind Eunach

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:NANDIGRAM & WEST BENGAL
by your friend on Dec 04, 2007 04:52 PM   Permalink
West Bengal "Emerging"?? An IT sector at saltlake sector 5 does not mean that. Go and compare WB with many other places of the country and you will get the real taste of overall growth.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:NANDIGRAM & WEST BENGAL
by shaji tabor on Dec 04, 2007 05:03 PM   Permalink
Dont get confused friend, IT means INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY not INDIAN TOILETS

   Forward   |   Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
Buddha takes back 'tit-for-tat' comment