RE:Ram Setu
by Dream Girl on Aug 31, 2007 04:50 PM Permalink
Let us surely live in the present... so let us go and destroy all forests and burn up in the name of development... So what if they are a natural formation and have ecological meaning for their existence...
RE:RE:Ram Setu
by ANURAG LALA on Aug 31, 2007 04:51 PM Permalink
arun dont try to be too modern...we should preserve our religion/cultural heritages.you cannot built this structure again.... ok
RE:Ram Setu
by Dark Avenger on Aug 31, 2007 04:51 PM Permalink
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Adams_Bridge_aerial.jpg
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Adams_bridge_2.jpg man see the pictures and tell me whether its just a faith??Can there be natural formation of such excellent structure??
RE:Ram Setu
by arungopal agarwal on Aug 31, 2007 05:04 PM Permalink
No, If there is way out why not we should preserve it, my aim is not to hurt anyone feelings.
RE:Ram Setu
by R Balasubramanian on Aug 31, 2007 04:59 PM Permalink
HAVE YOU SEEN ALL THE SEVEN WONDERS OF THE WORLD? YOU KNOW IT ONLY THROUGH MEDIA. YOU ARE KNOWN TO THE WORLD ONLY THROUGH YOUR PARENTS AND YOU KNOW YOUR FATHER THROUGH YOUR MOTHER. SO YOU CONSIDER THIS AS FANATIC. DONT YOU RESPECT YOUR GRANDFATHER AND GREAT GRANDFATHER THOUGH YOU HAVE NOT SEEN THEM? SO DONT COMMUNALISE AND TRY TO RESPECT YOUR RELIGION OR THE RELIGIOUS SENTIMENTS OF OTHERS OF YOUR RELIGION. YOU ARE FREE TO WALK ON THE MIDDLE OF THE ROAD BUT DONT FORCE OTHERS TO WALK.
RE:RE:Ram Setu
by R Balasubramanian on Aug 31, 2007 05:01 PM Permalink
CORRECTION. YOU ARE FREE TO WALK ON THE MIDDLE OF THE ROAD BUT DONT LAUGH AT PEOPLE WALKING ON THE FOOTPATH.
