Mr Sreenivastion is deplomate.if not the political parties are facing electorates who is facing electirate? Is the indian parliament is not a choice of electorates?Probably he is more wellversed american democratic syetem.He must remember that our system is better than american democratic system admitted by american press.There was no objection to any deal provided that soverignity is not affected. That point is not discussed by Mr Serinivasan.Question is why our negotiator fail to do so?Without reffering to this question ,why they are telling this is a best possible deal?Interestingly they are not even mentioning Dr Prasad"s (former chairman of atomic energy) Why??
RE:let the little man decide.
by george on Aug 29, 2007 05:05 PM Permalink
The deal will produce 7% of our energy requirement for the next 40 years, provided India has a foreign policy congruent to US, halt further development of nuclear arsenal, and supports US in isolating new nuclear states(read Iran). its as simple as that... You don't have to be a nuclear scientist to understand this. If this is acceptable, everything is fine. The complete text of the 123 agreement, the Hyde act and the nuclear deal with china is available here. http://www.xrl.us/4jp8
