10-15 yrs back Ahmedabad used to be counted after the 4 metros along with Hyderabad and Bangalore. Now it is nowehere in picture. Bangalore and Hyd have far overtaken it as a growing city. Even Pune which used to be behind Ahmedabad is a much more growing city than Abd now. All this due to stupid Modi and BJP which did nothing other than tomtoming their achievements under Vibrant Guj. Guj has been vibrating in last 7 yrs but mainly in riots, earthquakes, narmada andolan and so on....
RE:Ahmedabad
by Tushar Sakhalkar on Aug 29, 2007 01:49 PM Permalink
(1) Ahmedabad was NEVER counted among 4 mteros. 4 Metros have alowas been Mumbai, Calcutta, Chennai & Delhi. (2) Fifth behind them was ALWAYS Bangalore. This statement is white lie and figment of imagination.
RE:Ahmedabad
by raju on Aug 29, 2007 02:18 PM Permalink
idiot where did i say ahd was counted among the metros? first read messages carefully. don't be in a hurry to shoot ur mouth off. ahd used to be counted along with bld and hyd in 1990. but since IT revolution, blr and hyd have far overtakend ahd as a city. even pune. is there any lie in this statement? if so, can u counter it with proper debate than shooting ur biased mouth off.
RE:Ahmedabad
by raju on Aug 29, 2007 02:36 PM Permalink
u can't counter my points just admit it. i am a high caste hindu btw so just shut up and stop suspecting.
RE:Ahmedabad
by chakra Gudipati on Aug 29, 2007 03:21 PM Permalink
I will try my best to counter your "arguement" with a proper debate. In terms of FDI inflows, the four metros and Bangalore are way way ahead of any other city, as of April 2007. The next cities are Hyderabad and Ahmedabad which are only marginally separated. please read the following link. Pune doesn't even figure in that list. http://dipp.nic.in/fdi_statistics/india_fdi_april2007.pdf
Now, is it fair to say you are the one shooting the mouth off with your "holier than thou" attitude. cool down and debate like a mature person. may be someone will respect you then. peace
RE:Ahmedabad
by hiren patel on Aug 29, 2007 01:45 PM Permalink
Where are you raju? Do you know GDP of Gujarat ? Do know investment of RBI report ? Do you know other Ifrastructure of gujarat ? You are comparing Hydrabad but what about other cities of Andhrapradesh? Gujarat has discovered natural gas in Andhrapradesh. What about other cities of karnataka ?
RE:RE:Ahmedabad
by raju on Aug 29, 2007 02:20 PM Permalink
other cities in guj developed mainly due to chimanbhai and his manufacturing revolution for guj as a result of which oil, textile and chemical sectors were developed. modi has done nothing beyond that. i know enuf of guj having stayed there, u bufoon.
RE:Ahmedabad
by on Aug 29, 2007 01:52 PM Permalink
Hyderabad alone is enough for the investment ...its more than the whole gujarat.. BANGLORE alone is more than enough for the investment ...its far more than the whole investment in GUJURAT ... IN GUJARAT ...you will see only AHMEDABAD developed ...where as SURAT is developed to certain extent ... where as if you compare VISHAKHAPATNAM and HYDERABAD ...or BANGLORE and MYSORE ...its far more developed ...go to those cities ..then you will realise
