This is shameless. Who are these fans, have they seen the 93 blast. If they, then they never react like this. These fans either were at the age of 15 or less when blast happened or the political leaders who wants minorities votes.
RE:For Dutt's fans, it was an anti-climax
by calisto fernandes on Aug 23, 2007 12:48 PM Permalink
hey harish ,what do u want to imply. just because some one was in possession of arms at the time of the blasts is he a criminal.Remember the courts did not establish any link between th earms at dutts residence and th eblasts. by the way remember th eblasts were a fallout of the riots started by your majority hindus. Remember it was the and still is the hindu majority who start the fire.and you ar eone of them.
RE:For Dutt's fans, it was an anti-climax
by Charan Chaupal on Aug 23, 2007 12:56 PM Permalink
disregard the blasts... possession of ak 47 is a crime and how can you profess somebody to go unpunished for that. try walking into a police station with an ak 47 (even without bullets), and you'll be promptly jailed. why advocate bail for this guy, who in his full senses, possessed illegal arms... just because he's able to act well...
RE:For Dutt's fans, it was an anti-climax
by HARISH S KATKAR on Aug 23, 2007 12:58 PM Permalink
Kindly refresh ur memory,the rifle found in his home which was one of them which were used in blast? If u don't have trust in justice. Then don't cry against injustice. We always salute our honourable judge Shri Kode & Shri Nikam
RE:For Dutt's fans, it was an anti-climax
by Prathap p on Aug 23, 2007 01:07 PM Permalink
Dutt is innocent as a Lilly. You may go to the judge and tell him you are convicted a wrong person. He is our dear munnbhai becasue criminal Dutt is nomore
RE:For Dutt's fans, it was an anti-climax
by Vijay K on Aug 23, 2007 01:01 PM Permalink
Fernandes , your arguments will only help legalise the real hell that India is. What is wrong is wrong , and you as a Christian must accept that
RE:For Dutt's fans, it was an anti-climax
by amit a on Aug 23, 2007 02:25 PM Permalink
hey this is your thinking and you call hindus cammunal. shamne on you. if being secular means worship all hardcore criminals then we better choose to remain communal. as long as minorities like you exist in india, narendra modi will remain a Hero of majority hindus. long live modi bhai and hindu hriday samrat bal thakerey
RE:For Dutt's fans, it was an anti-climax
by Mohammed Zameer on Aug 23, 2007 07:51 PM Permalink
hi!
I m not a fans of sanjay dutt, but still i love his charactor of munnabhia, everybody knows y he kept weapons not to killed anybody but to protect from hindus mobs...see dear 93 blast happened only when babri masjid demolised n its has created the riots in mumbai and killed most numbers of muslims then hindus..but nobody is taking abt that bcoz the attackers are hindus, i salute sri krishna report who has done the justice by accusing the right persons and one thing if u point out only Congress leader then its unfair, everybody knows who has involved in demolishing babri masjid.
RE:For Dutt's fans, it was an anti-climax
by HARISH K on Aug 23, 2007 08:44 PM Permalink
If you believe in sri krishna report then u must belive in justice given to 93 blast accused. Are you think that Sanju Baba is sensitive about his family? No Just think. When his mother was laid down, he was taking taste of drug. When his wife (Richa Sharma) was fighting against cancer (and what was the age of his daughter) . What he was doing? He was busy in romance. He was so lucky that a great person was his father? but what he did for him? Nothing, he destroyed his father's reputation.
(Note:- Sanju Baba will be awarded with Rajiv Gandhi award (probably next year) as Mr. Salman (A great person ) is awarded)
We must say Jai Sanju Baba ki, Jai salman bhai ki. Jai Congress ki.
RE:For Dutt's fans, it was an anti-climax
by Atul Modi on Aug 23, 2007 01:04 PM Permalink
Harish Katkar,
You must be just foooling yourself by implicating the act of arms possession as an act of violance. But you are not aware that ninitynine % of our politians are more crime related idiots than the person whom you are depicting as a part of the 93 blast. I have been thru the hindi riots in madras and the emergency in india apart from the three wars. So what has happened has nothing to do with sanju directly or indirectly. Just try to be your age and responde
RE:For Dutt's fans, it was an anti-climax
by HARISH KATKAR on Aug 23, 2007 01:20 PM Permalink
I think u also not trust in "JUSTICE". Then it is not good to argu with the people like u.
RE:RE:For Dutt's fans, it was an anti-climax
by rajat on Aug 23, 2007 01:31 PM Permalink
hey there, I now he has done a mistake by keeping arms at his residency.But there r so many people who has arms at there home and r still sitting at there home with out any action.And still u think he is a criminal then WHO R THE SHIV SAINIKS they trouble people now & then bands r there they create nuicence in each & every topic
RE:RE:RE:For Dutt's fans, it was an anti-climax
by HARISH KATKAR on Aug 23, 2007 01:42 PM Permalink
This is not arguments about shiv sainik (What type of trouble they are giving?) or other who keeps arms. This is about sanubaba only. If wants to argu on shiv sainik then let's have another topic on that. You have forgotten that who gave this rifle to SanjuBABA, who detroyed it.? If you want to ignore it, then there is no way. BE TRUST IN RIGHT JUSTICE.
RE:For Dutt's fans, it was an anti-climax
by rajiv maini on Aug 23, 2007 12:55 PM Permalink
mr harish, your thinking is pathetic and I think you are a fanatic, sanjay dutt is innocent and victim of circumsatances x kindly think before writing/
RE:RE:RE:For Dutt\'s fans, it was an anti-climax
by HARISH KATKAR on Aug 23, 2007 01:08 PM Permalink
Are u sure he is innocent.? At time he was trapped he was a druggist? Have u seen his photo when he was trapped.? Don't think only of Munnabhai or Lage raho.
RE:RE:For Dutt's fans, it was an anti-climax
by Prabhat Singh on Aug 23, 2007 01:22 PM Permalink
Thanks Rajiv %u2026%u2026 we should think before writing %u2026%u2026 but do you really think that Sanjay was innocent ? He had a illegal rifle for that he should punished %u2026.. He was a guilty and for that he should kept in jail. Harish is right, Just because Sanjay is acting well it means not that you will hide Sanjy%u2019s crime.
RE:RE:RE:For Dutt\'s fans, it was an anti-climax
by Prathap p on Aug 23, 2007 01:09 PM Permalink
because he took to wepons to protect his family and friends. To kill the rioteers. He took to drugs to forget his past, rxbde
