RE:PM is a slave of Sonia, not for India
by Libran on Aug 14, 2007 08:23 PM Permalink
I don't agree that what PM told is Sonia's wish. She does not have the capability to think about these things. It must be some forces within the country or outside who are getting their agenda completed through Sonia. I see sonia as a pure Gold empty pot (Pure gold because of her personal character and empty because of her capability). You can put milk in it or poison. It still holds.
RE:PM is a slave of Sonia, not for India
by us on Aug 14, 2007 09:00 PM Permalink
See, how congress supporters are givings their last breathe to fulfil their Madam's every wish - Make puppet President, puppet vice president, puppet PM, any more of Italian wish. After all who is she ? She is nothing but a Pure Foreigner, just mamaged to sleep with (once) Prince of a Indian ONE-family.
RE:PM is a slave of Sonia, not for India
by us on Aug 14, 2007 10:40 PM Permalink
She is nothing but a Pure Foreigner, just mamaged to sleep with (once) Prince of a Indian ONE-family. By this qualification many things come her automatically as you said.
Since you are perfectly Pro-Sonia, definitely you will not accept any other logic. However there are million of Naturalized Indians. Nobody is power-hunger like her. She made puppet PM, puppet President and vice President, and after all she is SUPER PM. No body in the upper office can take a single breathe without her permission. What else does she need?
Most importantly many of your quotes are joke "sacrificing her personal life for our country" "She proved that she is patriotic than any other normal Indian women" "She came to politics to save India" "People of India voted for her as a whole and she had all the rights to become our prime minister" "She is the president of the ruling party of India" She was not a member of the party, directly become president of the party. --she is/was not power-hunger !
RE:PM is a slave of Sonia, not for India
by Ravikumar on Aug 14, 2007 11:30 PM Permalink
U Indian, Only chiristian blokes like u lick the feet of Sonia. What personal life did she sacrifice.Is she led a play girl life before? Congress won only 142 seats in parliment which is below25%.How can u say people accepted her?
RE:PM is a slave of Sonia, not for India
by Libran on Aug 14, 2007 09:54 PM Permalink
Indian. Please understand this. This is not about BJP/COngress question. It is about India. I have great respect for her personal integrity. But there will be millions in the country of billion who will be equivalent or better than her in integrity. Question here is about capability and intellectual capacity (not intelligence) to understand such complicated thing as Nuclear deal, let alone comment about it.
The current question is, if she is a real leader she should leave it to people who better understand the deal and should not comment on it. The fact that she is making such statements shows that someone is playing behind and she is only a puppet as she has a clean image. God forbid- If that 'Sutradhar' is a traitor- India will go to dogs. It is people like you who will bilndly agree to everything that she does who will be letting India down. If that is what your final aim is I have no arguments with you.
Please mark my strong reaction- She may be a good person. But she has no capability to be a leader or a policy maker. It is only sychophant Indians who pulled her in to politics - to gain through the Gandhi name (which itself is ill-gotten by the family. I don't mean ill-gotten by Sonia). So do not agree to whatever she does blindly.
RE:RE:PM is a slave of Sonia, not for India
by Libran on Aug 14, 2007 11:00 PM Permalink
Dear Indian, Pls dont talk any more rubbish libran I agre you have right to say what I say say is rubbish. You don't have right to dictate to me to say - "don't talk anymore" I won't take your dictat- whether it is accompanied by pls or not.
What made you to say someone palying behind this deal? Pls read all my posts- I did not say someone is behind the deal. I am telling that some one is behind Sonia's statement. When a puppet speaks in a puppet show, you know it is not puppet speaking but you won't know who is really speaking. If you don't agree, I reserve my right to differ. I have not criticized the deal or spoken against it as I am not erudite enough to understand if it is good for our country. I understand it is good for energy scenario, nut not sure if we will have to pay a high price of "sovereignity" . That is why I did not criticize or prise this deal. I have no political ambition to gain from it. Yes, I do believe that Gandhi name is ill-gotten by this family. Whenever I say this people only deride me, but are not able to give even an ordinary explanation other than what I know how this family name was obtained. I would not have cared if that was any XYZ name- But the name of Gandhi was gotten for political mileage and nothing else. You have the right to call me BJP/RSS. No one would care either I am a pinko or safronite
RE:RE:PM is a slave of Sonia, not for India
by neel sanghvi on Aug 14, 2007 10:20 PM Permalink
Let me put your words correctly. She is not a foriegner anymore. She is naturalised citizen of India. - She fakes her degree to get into politics.
She is widow of our Ex-Prime minister. - She is worse than Ex-prime minister.
She is the daughter-in-law of most respected Indira Gandhi. - She is dauther0in-law of Indira Gandhi, who place immergency just to save her own ruling and destroyed papers containig names all POW so that no one can ever find out how she mishandeled war.
She is sacrificing her personal life for our country. She stayed away from politics after even after her husband's death. - She was not able to enter into politics because she is selfish and she had no guts to came after what congress did for india in past 50 years and she is doing even worse.
She proved that she is patriotic than any other normal Indian women who marry another one when husband dies. She stayed simple and modest and set a good example of Indian woman. - She knew very well that she can not be PM as per indian constitution and hence she rejected it. She rejected because she knew that it does not matter if she will be PM or not. She will always get puppets and can get whatever she wants.
She came to politics to save India from the hands of BJP which was ruining this country with communal riots and corruption. - She came to power to ruin india and increase corruption as secularism and seperation.
People of India voted for her as a whole and she had all the rights to become our prime min
RE:PM is a slave of Sonia, not for India
by BHAGWAT SINGH on Aug 14, 2007 08:53 PM Permalink
It should be the speech given to sonia by the old desert fox nearing 90 arjun singh(the real poison of congress)
