OUR pm has never said that it will make use of nuclear material supplied by u.s.a or others, will be used for making weapons.we shall have every right to make n.bombs from our own processed uranium.america should have no say on our own establishments.i think due care must have been taken in the agreement,if not we should make it clear.making bombs or no bombs is irrelevant in this agreement.this is a civilian agreement for peaceful use of nuclear energy.let us not stop this.price is main consideration.american products are very costly.atleast we should have one plant running in his country of american technology.experts shall be engaged to study deeply the impact of this agreement in our future course.do not blutly reject this agreement.give good signal to the world.
RE:prime minister statement in parliament
by Joyee Funee on Aug 14, 2007 10:56 AM Permalink
Well history of USA suggest it never does favor to any country unless It has its own benefits more in it. AND SPECIALLY IN CASE OF NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER And Track record of last 60 years of India, India has always succumbed to US pressure So this deal is very senesitive lloking the History of both countries and needs to be auidted and critically evaluated before being signed
