Akhtar Khan, one of the MLAs of MIM who fiercely protected their move of attacking the author. "She is enemy of Islam, she is a black spot on Muslims," lashed out a defiant Khan. "We cannot bear anyone talking against Islam. She has written books against our government, Islam. We will not tolerate her in Hyderabad." When asked about his party's stand on the attack, Khan proudly said, "I am a Muslim first and then an MLA. My party is with me in this."
So he joined the politics to completely favour the Muslims? Does that sound right from the above statement. Whatever might be the cause how can an MLA attack someone for his religion? I fail to understand.
When some artist drew our gods picture nude we just stood there and did not comment. Well done hindu's. Keep it up. Infact we do write articles about his greatness.
I am sure our muslim sympathisers will let us know some incidents where a Hindu MLA called himself a Hindu before he was an MLA.
RE:Look at what an MLA says?
by sunny on Aug 09, 2007 02:47 PM Permalink
YOU need to understand the afct the for Muslims religion comes first before the Nation. Whatever he has dais is within these perameters.
RE:Look at what an MLA says?
by Anurag Shrivastava on Aug 09, 2007 03:09 PM Permalink
well - in that case they should find a nation which allows religion to come before the nation. India is not one of them so .... time to pack some bags ?? there are a lot of people waiting to just help do that. Do not make them angry.
RE:Look at what an MLA says?
by purna on Aug 09, 2007 02:56 PM Permalink
The congress government in AP must take immediate action to prevent deterioration of law and order. Let us see how the press, the media and secularists, and the communists will react.
