What would be the consequences of a US or Israeli attack on Iran%u2019s nuclear energy sites?
At the 2006 Perdana Global Peace Forum, Australian medical scientist Dr. Helen Caldicott provided an authoritative analysis of the devastating impact on human life that would result from the radiation release from such an attack. [VIDEO: The Dangers of a Nuclear War, Global Research, July 28, 2006]
Dr. Caldicott described the catastrophic deaths that would result from a conventional attack on nuclear facilities and the long-term increase in cancer deaths from the radiation release.
Should the attack be made with nuclear weapons%u2014as some of Bush%u2019s criminally insane neoconservative advisers advocate%u2014the populations of many countries would suffer for generations from radioactive particles in air, water, and food chains. Deaths would number in the many millions.
Such an attack justified in the name of "American security" and "American hegemony" would constitute the rawest form of evil the world has ever seen, far surpassing in evil the atrocities of the Nazi and Communist regimes.
Dr. Caldicott detailed the horrible long-term consequences for the Iraqi population from the US military%u2019s current use of depleted uranium in explosive ammunition used in Iraq. Caldicott explained that "depleted" does not mean depleted of radiation. She explained that each time such ammunition is used, radioactive particles are released in the air and are absorbed into people%u2019s lungs. We are yet
RE:Why the world is silent ?
by Sunil on Aug 04, 2007 08:05 PM Permalink
Sir, let Saudi Arabia and Pakistan protest against USA regarding Iraq. Those are your favorite countries anyway. India should focus on the Kashmiri Pandits who have been displaced by Muslim fanatics and terrorist. Let's put our own house in order first. We have to crush Kashmiri militants by severe force first.
