First: I think Sabeel's mother received a call from UK enquiring whereabouts of the SIM card owner (i.e. Haneef).
Second: I think she in turn called Haneef's brother and informed him about it. And also she might have told him that Haneef's SIM card put her two children in trouble.
Fourth: Haneef's family feared and told him to leave for India from Australia
Fourth: I think Haneef's father-in-law bought him a ticket because he was not having money to go to India.
Fifth: Haneef chatted with his brother.
Sixth: AFP arrested him in the Airport.
My Conclusion: Haneef came to know about the attacks only through Sabeel's mother. He was not having any knowledge about the blasts in UK, prior to the attacks. He tried to call UK police to let them know that he is nothing to do with the attacks. So he is not at all a suspect. He merely feared because he is living abroad in a foreign country that too alone. That's all.... Is this a crime???????
RE:My Opinion: He is innocent
by shahjehan on Aug 01, 2007 07:25 PM Permalink
aha, aha.....anandkumar, you please write exam for CBI... you have a brain yaar... one day you will break a cocunut.. (but not to break in your neighbour's head..)
RE:My Opinion: He is innocent
by Anandkumar on Aug 01, 2007 07:31 PM Permalink
Question: Do you think that UK police have got any evidence against Haneef? Answer : NO
Question: Do you think that Australia police have got any evidence against Haneef? Answer : NO. He did not involve in any such conversations( chat or phone calls or any thing else) prior to the attacks.
RE:My Opinion: He is innocent
by Sujeel on Aug 01, 2007 07:28 PM Permalink
A Good Work, it's called brain stroming all lunatic must learn from AnandKumar.
