RE:Rediff is communally biased. DID NOT COVER THE FAKE ENCOUNTER KILLINGs story intentionally:
by indian bharat on Apr 25, 2007 10:57 AM Permalink
Yes Mr. Tabish you are right. Rediff and all other media is biased in India when it comes to reporting on sensitive issues. Incident of Godhra train burning was buried under aftermath. Kashmiri Hindu pandits fate and future was never highlighted by this media. After Babri demolition violence initiated by the muslims were put on backstage and when Hindus retaliated it has become a heinous crime. Some of these media has become a stooges before the money given to them which they get from their out of border boss or dogs.
RE:[object]
by sabu abraham on Apr 25, 2007 11:37 AM Permalink
i am not a muslim , but i wish to ask mr.ganesh das a question,when babar attacked ram temple where did ram hide? was ram helpless to fight against babar? we great dravidians of india respect and salute babar. RAVANA is our king,he is a loving,compassionate king with high moral qualities.even though Ravana is a king , he never raped sita, that is dravidian quality. so respect Ravana and dravidians. that ariyan ram killed our great king ravana. so it is the curse of Ravana,that ended up in the destroyal of ram temple by Babar.so we dravidians irrespective of religions support Babar. ariyans should leave india and go to afgan,iran or nepal. we indians no need ariyans any more,ariyans are curse to indian society and they are anti nationals.JAI RAVANA, JAI DRAVIDIANS.
RE:Rediff is communally biased. DID NOT COVER THE FAKE ENCOUNTER KILLINGs story intentionally:
by eclipse on Apr 25, 2007 11:05 AM Permalink
are you mad ? why are you digging up issues to divide indian ? why are you not trying to unite indians ? are you a traitor ? where is your indianess? do you call yourself a hindu/muslim or an Indian? Shame on you traitor.
RE:[object]
by muneer abidi on Apr 25, 2007 11:07 AM Permalink
mr. ganesh there is a law in India, if so go to the court and follow its decision. if same action will be taken by muslims, we will become traitor by you.. and you will be calling us Paki or ISI agents.
RE:[object]
by muneer abidi on Apr 25, 2007 11:12 AM Permalink
mr eclipse, traitors are those who have spoile my beloved coutry. traitors are those politicians who put their personal benefits prior to national benefits. traitors are those who spread hatred among Indians, traitors are those who have bring corruption in our system. where are muslims in these catogries. almost 99% of govt sectors are hindus.. and see the condition of our system .. tell me who is a traitor
RE:Rediff is communally biased. DID NOT COVER THE FAKE ENCOUNTER KILLINGs story intentionally:
by eclipse on Apr 25, 2007 11:15 AM Permalink
Mr. Abidi, I understand what you say. I am not one of those who will find pride in killings of muslims in Gujarat. Infact as a hindu I am really ashamed of the act commited by the hindus and the muslims there. The fact is that Indians killed each other. I am not saying that one community is a bigger traitor than other. Everyone is corrupt and selfish Everyone is just worried about self. Unless we bring country before self we are all traitors.
RE:Rediff is communally biased. DID NOT COVER THE FAKE ENCOUNTER KILLINGs story intentionally:
by eclipse on Apr 25, 2007 11:02 AM Permalink
You write like a terrorist. Are you not ashamed of openly talking about killing fellow Indians ? Where is your sense of nationality ? Why are you hell bent on dividing such a beautiful country ?
RE:Rediff is communally biased. DID NOT COVER THE FAKE ENCOUNTER KILLINGs story intentionally:
by muneer abidi on Apr 25, 2007 11:04 AM Permalink
when muslims are talking for thier welfare in india, hindus like nishant dube simply say go th Pakistan.. this is a mentality of almost all hundus. they demolished babri mosque, no body was punished. modi killed 10000 muslims .. no body was punished.. instead many innocent muslims were put in jail for nothing. as being Indian, I strongly support to rehabitat hindus in kashmir and removal of article 357.
hindus are more communal / narrow minded than any other community exist in India.
RE:Rediff is communally biased. DID NOT COVER THE FAKE ENCOUNTER KILLINGs story intentionally:
by sabu abraham on Apr 25, 2007 11:19 AM Permalink
minority upper caste hindus(ariyans) are a problem to india.they are invaders,they looted ,killed lakhs of innocent low caste hinds(dravidians),more than that they made dravidians slaves and raped dravidian woman and produced children. every religion in india should support the dravidians to fight against upper caste ariyans.i expect everyons opinion.
RE:Rediff is communally biased. DID NOT COVER THE FAKE ENCOUNTER KILLINGs story intentionally:
by eclipse on Apr 25, 2007 11:22 AM Permalink
So what are you trying to prove here ? You are trying to prove that Muslims are more voilent ? Where is your sense ? Bhagvat Gita is based on wars. There are many instances of violence in Bible. And even for jews, moses asked the jews to kill all the people who worshipped the cow. So all religions teach violence ?
RE:Rediff is communally biased. DID NOT COVER THE FAKE ENCOUNTER KILLINGs story intentionally:
by muneer abidi on Apr 25, 2007 11:32 AM Permalink
i personally dont believe in BUKHARI, some statements may correct and other may wrong. only quran is the book which to be followed by muslims. I don't know what tavish is talking.
RE:RE:Rediff is communally biased. DID NOT COVER THE FAKE ENCOUNTER KILLINGs story intentionally:
by muneer abidi on Apr 25, 2007 11:55 AM Permalink
tavish, which religion do u follow ?
RE:RE:RE:Rediff is communally biased. DID NOT COVER THE FAKE ENCOUNTER KILLINGs story intentionally:
by tavish tavish on Apr 25, 2007 12:05 PM Permalink
yoga of mind control muneer and we all know who gave the world yoga and meditation by the way I also follow the advaitya school of thought as taught by raman maharshi and yes I have read the vedas and I cant find a single verse which says that slay non-believers in the name of god.
RE:RE:RE:RE:Rediff is communally biased. DID NOT COVER THE FAKE ENCOUNTER KILLINGs story intentionally:
by eclipse on Apr 25, 2007 12:15 PM Permalink
still you are only one who is abusing people here!!!!
RE:Rediff is communally biased. DID NOT COVER THE FAKE ENCOUNTER KILLINGs story intentionally:
by eclipse on Apr 25, 2007 11:37 AM Permalink
There is nothing like a facist faith. As I said earlier there is an element of voilence present in all religions. The fact that you are highlighing just one religion only shows your biase. As for me I do not believe in any religion and I have seen violence in each and every religion. Isnt Gita a book based on two wars that killed millions ? Isnt there multiple instances of violence in the Bible ? Isnt there multiple instances of violence in the old testament followed by christans and jews ? Why single out one. All are responsible.
RE:[object]
by sabu abraham on Apr 25, 2007 11:53 AM Permalink
Dear brother and friend eclipse, there is no violence in New Testament Bible. can you point out one? but in Old Testament when you read you see few violence,but there is a mistry and secret behind that,if you go and study that from a good teacher you will never ever say it is violence. I am not a good teacher, so i cannot teach you. find one Old Testament guru and learn. best wishes eclipse.
RE:RE:[object]
by Nomad on Apr 25, 2007 12:59 PM Permalink
Dear Mr Sabu, The ones who loose faith can not claim anything. The fact of the matter is that Ravana was a Shaivaite and the most well known of those in the times of Ramayan. Careful study of Ramayan will reveal that Ravan got killed only because he eyed another person's wife and refused to accept his mistake in arrogance. That why he is called an Asur though he had a Sage for a father.
But you will never understand that, because you are viewing things with Roman Blinds...
RE:Rediff is communally biased. DID NOT COVER THE FAKE ENCOUNTER KILLINGs story intentionally:
by tavish tavish on Apr 25, 2007 11:54 AM Permalink
gita is not sanatan dharama unlike quran and islam,santan dharma is prevailing since prehistoric times(read the vedas and then mention gita),it does not distinguish between beleivers and non-believers,and as far as the wars you are talking about which are mentioned in the gita,they are not amongst the hindus and non-hindus but amongst family members of the same faith,sanatan dharam makes no distinction between belivers and non-believers,.it is the only faith wich does not call worshippers of other faiths names like kaafirs,heathens,pagans,infidels,it is the most magnanimous faith in the world,sure it has a few issues today like the caste system but they were not prevalent in earlier times,the priests wanted to secure the future of their progeny by virtue of their birth and hence corrupted the faith a bit,but dont be fooled islam is an arab imperialist cult which seeks global domination and it too had slaves as is mentioned in the quran.
RE:RE:Rediff is communally biased. DID NOT COVER THE FAKE ENCOUNTER KILLINGs story intentionally:
by eclipse on Apr 25, 2007 12:18 PM Permalink
So does it mean that Gita teaches you to kill your own family members ?
