Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
We need full information..
by satya Gonela on Apr 23, 2007 10:19 PM   Permalink | Hide replies

Here my colleagues argue that, attempts are being made to turn pro-reservationists against Supreme court.. They say facts are not coming out.. Why not Rediff publish full judgement / atleast more details of Supreme court verdict rather than bits and pieces? I came to know that Supreme court is not fully against any reservations.. It only questioned 1. the validity of caste census: not recent census but very old and suspicious.2. What are the motives of Government in not exempting creamy-layer? If IPS / IAS officers belonging to reservations categories, earn lots through out their career, and.. Are we in support of reservations for children of such rich people? In which case, poor and real needy people who need to have reservations, cannot compete with these rich people who enjoy reservations.
In my opinion, 1. let there be reservations, but for the bottom-most sections of our society, need not necessarily be on caste-basis. 2. What ever the reservations are there, they are sufficient. Effort should in the direction such that, the fruits of this reservation system reach only the deserving people.


    Forward  |  Report abuse
  RE:We need full information..
by serial on Apr 23, 2007 10:35 PM   Permalink
no oneis against reservation.
people are against
1 sick vote bank mentality of congress and other parties.
2 how to help poor people genuinely as creamy layer is eating up reservation for last 60 years

so why govt is not speaking for that.
we are indian and no one want to eat up alone.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
SC declines to vacate quota stay