The way the judgement is presented by the reporter is absolutely misleading. The Judges have noted that the necessary ingredients which is required for passing a writ of habeas corpus is ILLEGAL DETENTION and the same is missing in this case, hence the writ of habeas corpus couldnot be issued. The observations of the Judges are following the above finding given on the legal issue, and donot have any binding force. The husband has other courses open to him, like approaching matrimonial court for Restitution of Conjugal Rights or going to police or court with complaint of adultery. But the court has merely held that a case for habeas corpus is not made out and hence such writ cannot be issued. Whosoever has reported the above, has simply twisted the facts and findings recorded in the judgement to make it a sensational news, which is bad, both ethically as a journalist and morally as a citizen.
