Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
India must reject this deal
by Dipak Bose on Apr 20, 2007 05:03 AM   Permalink | Hide replies

India must reject this deal, it is a surrender to the Anglo-American dominance, nothing else.
1)It will ruin India's nuclear weapons programme. India will be balckmailed by Pakistan and China.
2) India does not need any technology from USA; it has got everything from the Soviet Union since 1974 and from Russia now.
3) Russia has suggested to build offshore nuclear plants to avoid the sanctions imposed by the Nuclear Suppliers Group.
4) USa wants to control the FBR( Fast Breeder Reactors) built by the Soviet Union in India. FBR does not need much Uranium, it needs Thorium, which India got in plenty. FBR produces Plutonium, which can be used in nuclear weapons and as fuel for power stations. FBRs can make India independent. That is the reason USA wants to control these and give India instead very old Uranium based power stations at a cost which is 10 times higher than the corresponding nuclear plants Russia can supply.
5) USA is not India's friend. It is an enemy in disguise. Remember the Sanskrit verse:
Bisha Kumva Poya Mukham
( A vessel full of poison but on the top there is honey).
That is the exact description of USA.
Don't be deceived by them. They only want money from India and want to ruin India.
Remember ENRON, promoted by Dick Cheney ran away from India without paying Rs.6300 Crores to the Industrial Development Bank of India. In the same way now American poerr companies want to rape India.



    Forward  |  Report abuse
  RE:India must reject this deal
by sushil prasad sati on Apr 20, 2007 02:18 PM   Permalink
Its not about transfer of technologies but having fuel from the nuclear reserves spreaded around the world. The thorium tech u suggested is devised in India and did not come from Russia. But I guess this really does not solve the problems in the near future and need more R&D. I Guess it was used by India as a strategy of having the nuclear deal in favour to india and to have a upper hand during negotiations. Because America does not want India to be Independent based on these adavance tech. On the other hands India want the energy for the near future. Its now that we are seeing such a growth in Asia and India would not like to giva away the advantage to china due to the curbed situation of Energy. I hope India or any other country would not let the advance research out of the focus. India is just buying time with this deal so tha she can follow the path of growth without slowing down. Forget the idealistic vision and claiming America enemy, think wisely what is good for India. Beware every country in the world looks for domination and seize any chance coming forward, whether small or big. At they all dream for the better world. Its cat & mouse game and I hope India is playing a cat here.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:[object]
by Jamali on Apr 20, 2007 03:36 PM   Permalink

Another fool........USSR built FBR reactor BR-1 in 1955.

   Forward   |   'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
  RE:RE:India must reject this deal
by ratnesh srivastav on Apr 20, 2007 05:55 AM   Permalink
Dipak
FBR is INDIAN technology. No other country has mastered this tech

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:India must reject this deal
by Jamali on Apr 20, 2007 03:32 PM   Permalink
Not an Indian technology or invention.

FYI USA had FBR reactors in 1950s. Also 6 more countries have built FBR reactors 30 years ago.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:India must reject this deal
by sushil sati on Apr 20, 2007 06:16 PM   Permalink
Well I hope the guy like Jamali understand that matter is not about who discovered FBR first but whether u have it or not. India developed it independently and owe the power. Now even more important consideration what purpose does it solve. Does it really gonna help our near future energy requirements? Moreover are we looking forward to the handicapt nation with no energy. How about a nation who can build Nuclear weapon because No US on top (Which I am afraid will always be) but no energy supply because the friends of the mighty will not supply any fuel. Its analysation of the situation of the future. I guess we got to be careful but also decisive in the same time. you do not come on the table with thinking mind, instead a prepared mind. When India was offered with the deal India must be in prepared situation with all the calculations done to decide and not to scratch the head. In my point of view, this deal is in favour of India and its future.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:India must reject this deal
by Sanjay Hazra on Apr 20, 2007 03:54 PM   Permalink
Dipak Bose seems to be the same commie baboon.


   Forward   |   Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
N-deal: Kakodkar called to US