When it was well known that is writing and poetry was not of readable variety and that he was a disturbed person, how was he allowed to continue in the university without any psychatric treatment. This clearly shows the teacher just take a lesson and go away. There is no personal touch on the students. If it was there definately it would have been noted and some positive action would have been taken to avoid this kind of mishap.
RE:How he continued in the University
by Shantanu Bapat on Apr 19, 2007 04:35 AM Permalink
What exactly do you mean by his material was not of readable variety or disturbing? There is no objective way of defining those terms. Hence, nothing can be done. If I find something disturbing in someone, should that mean that the person should be sent to a mental facutly? Obviously not. Hope you got the point.
RE:How he continued in the University
by AnswersToQuestions on Apr 18, 2007 11:56 PM Permalink
A teacher volunteered to teach him one on one. I dont think oen can give a more "Personal Touch" than that.
