This one is an interesting story and gives us an insight into DECISION MAKING
A group of children are playing near two railway tracks, one still in use and the other unused.
Only one child is playing on the unused track, the rest on the operational track. A train comes and you are just beside the track changer. You can make the train change its course to the unused track and save most of the kids. However that would also mean the lone child playing on the unused track would be killed. Will you let the train go on its way or switch its tracks?
Pl. Pause for a minute and take a decision.
Many of us might choose to divert the course of the train and sacrifice only one child because to save most of the children at the expense of only one child is a rational decision that most people would make morally and emotionally. But have you ever thought the child choosing to play on the unused track had in fact made the right decision to play at a safe place?
Nevertheless, he had to be sacrificed because of his ignorant friends who chose to play where the danger was.This kind of dilemma happens around us everyday. In the office, in the community, in politics and especially in a democratic society, the minority (here the word does not mean the contempory political word-'minority' ) is often sacrificed for the interest of the majority, no matter how ignorant the majority is, and how far-sighted and knowledgeable the minority is. The child who chose not to play with the rest on the operational track was sidelined. And in case he was sacrificed, no one would shed tear for him.
The kids playing on the operational track should have known very well that the track was still in use, and that they should have run away if they heard the train's sirens. If the train was diverted, that lone child would definitely die because he never thought the train could come over to that track! Moreover that track was not in use probably because it was not safe. If the train was diverted to the track, we could put the lives of all the passengers on board at stake! And in your attempt to save a few kids by sacrificing one child, you might end up sacrificing hundreds of people to save these few kids. While we are all aware that life is full of tough decisions that need to be made, we may not realize that hasty decisions may not always be the right ones.
REMEMBER:- "What's right isn't popular..... and what's popular isn't always right."
RE:DECISION MAKING
by amit madan on Apr 17, 2007 01:01 PM Permalink
Your story might not be relevant to this context but thats very much reevant with Indian system. Nice one!!
RE:DECISION MAKING
by Ram Sharma on Apr 17, 2007 04:29 PM Permalink
though the example given is not relevant and ending is not good. but still it gives a food for thought.
RE:DECISION MAKING
by Natarajan HK on Apr 17, 2007 11:01 AM Permalink
Not very relevant! Looks like you have copy pasted from elsewhere without giving much importance to the contezt.
And then there are too many assumptions - one kid on an unused track, divert the train to the unused one, kids(!!!) should apply sense!, people are at risk when diverted to the unused track.
do you think the train would be diverted if the unused track is not operational?
You started off well but ended up with too many unrealistic assumptions and made a mess of it.
RE:RE:DECISION MAKING
by Shak IsHere on Apr 17, 2007 12:06 PM Permalink
natarajan, just read the article and keep your mouth shut. who asked for your "expert" opinion? nobody gives a damn about ur unintelligent reply. Do you have to pull anybody down to prove your point. Be constructive in your criticism nut-rajan
RE:RE:RE:DECISION MAKING
by Aanadi Aanant on Apr 17, 2007 12:18 PM Permalink
what the effing hell !!! kids should not play on rail tracks at all....why the effing hell u pasted this irrelevant and stupid story here?
