Now why doesn't the U.S call this man a terrorist? If there was a muslim man in place of the man who shot the 33 people, then the U.S would have branded him as a terrorist.
RE:He is a terrorist, why not?
by manickam ravi on Apr 17, 2007 03:56 PM Permalink
no doubt he is not less than a terrorist. those who kill innocent people, belong to any religion will be terrorists only. protecting culprits by virtue of religion or race is a danger to mankind.
RE:He is a terrorist, why not?
by Salman Khan on Apr 17, 2007 04:37 PM Permalink
This is the work of the western media. Tht's wht exactly I'm trying to say. The western media protrays all the killings by muslim men as terrorists activities and killings by non-muslims as just " killings " as in the University shootings case. And people like you are misguided to think that all the terrorist activities in the world are done by muslims. Since the media always associates the killings by muslims as terrorist and killings by non-muslims as just " killings ". And they brain wash the public into thinking that whenever a mulsim does a killing he is a terrorist and whenever a non-muslim does a killing, he is a killer.
RE:RE:He is a terrorist, why not?
by jet on Apr 17, 2007 07:45 PM Permalink
Salman, There are 100s of criminals in India who are muslims, we dont call every body terrorists, we call them gangsters etc.. When muslims in pakistan do mercy killings the western media dont call them terrorists. Ur opinion is wrong. There are lot of terrorist organizations in the world which are terrorizing the people in the name of religion. Most of them are doing in the name of Islam. When ever they do some activity, they claim their responsibility.So they are rightly called terrorists. If this was done by muslim then as u said evry body would have tried to trace any terrorist organization links because after 9/11 evry body suspects u guys.
RE:He is a terrorist, why not?
by SURESH MANJALAGIRI on Apr 17, 2007 04:33 PM Permalink
Salman, Talk Practical. Any guy who kills somebody without a purpose or a mind is a terrorist. Yes they are there in our Kashmir, Outside Kashmir, In US and Outside US. But a Point to ponder.. IN all these HAPPENINGS at US is we lost a good fellow indian out there. Just like how we lost the other day in our backyard (IISC Campus). Eitherway the terrorist has taken away these poor victims who R no way responsible for any of things that's happening around them
RE:He is a terrorist, why not?
by chapar on Apr 17, 2007 03:35 PM Permalink
Arey Salman Bhai, he was a lover and not terrorist. You want me to brand him terrorist, then done...
RE:He is a terrorist, why not?
by Salman Khan on Apr 17, 2007 03:38 PM Permalink
My point is, suppose the muslim guy would had been a lover, even then they would have branded him a terrorist.
RE:He is a terrorist, why not?
by R N on Apr 17, 2007 04:59 PM Permalink
My dear Salman Khan, most of the whites who do this work is due to some kind of psychological problems most of the times. But when muslim does it, it is always some terrorist organisation associated with it. So far there is no incident stating that any muslim killed someone due to mental disorder. It was always related to his links with the terrorist gangs....now got it...whats the difference between killing by muslim and non muslim.
RE:RE:He is a terrorist, why not?
by Salman Khan on Apr 17, 2007 05:05 PM Permalink
I think ur blindly following the information given to u by the western media.
RE:He is a terrorist, why not?
by SURESH MANJALAGIRI on Apr 17, 2007 04:35 PM Permalink
Salman, Don't bring a Communal angle here also by saying if there was a Muslim Man etc.. Boy start to think OUT OF THE BOX. U R living in a 22nd century world buddy
RE:[object]
by Salman Khan on Apr 17, 2007 04:41 PM Permalink
Tht's wht I'm trying to convey people. The western media brain wash the public into thinking that whenever a mulsim does a killing he is a terrorist and whenever a non-muslim does a killing, he is a killer. So stop following the western media blindly, think on ur own because this is the 22nd century. There are many other ways to get information abt the world rather than depending on the western media and accepting whtever they say.
RE:He is a terrorist, why not?
by lakshminarayanarao ramachandruni on Apr 17, 2007 04:47 PM Permalink
You have to read your book which calls you to kill non muslims where ever you find them. why blame others for your own communities misdeeds and ideas
RE:He is a terrorist, why not?
by Salman Khan on Apr 17, 2007 04:52 PM Permalink
No, our book does not say " kill non muslims where ever you find them " , I wonder who gave u the wrong information. Our religion asks us to live in peace and harmony with other religion people. Our religion asks us to respect other religions. Our book does not allow us to convert people by force. Our book does not allow us to kill innocent people. Why blame the actions of a few ignorant people on the whole community?
RE:He is a terrorist, why not?
by confidential handlewithcare on Apr 17, 2007 04:25 PM Permalink
YES SALMAN I totally agree with you. The case would have even gone to the FBI and links from Pak and Afghanistan would be traced.
