a simple question.. what did India gain during the last 60 years of tussle with Pakistan (and Kashmiris) to retain Kashmir with India? Have we still have the full title and ownership of Kashir? Is Kashmiris accepts India as their country or they want Kashmir a seperate nation for them? Is Pakistan could make any difference by claiming Kashmir? We have been spending billions of rupees sacrificing thousands of Jawans and civilians over the years by claiming ownership of Kashmir and by way of peacekeeping... Were we able to protect the Kashmiris as a whole? were we able to seal our borders from infilteration? were we able to succeed in out attempt to fight terrorists/terrorism in J&K? then why are we making such a hue and cry of this peace of land...if none of the government in the past 60 years could come out with a clean and sincere effort to save kashmir and make India acceptable to them as well as the world... how long are we going to continue with this political agendas to retain power in the centre by these unscrupulous political menace? EITHER TAKE IT (with FORCE if required) or LEAVE IT.. let people live peacefully...
RE:Kashmir versus India versus Pakistan
by chakradhar gopal balappa on Apr 10, 2007 10:13 AM Permalink
first try to recitfy speeling mistakes in what u write .. then u can think about nation :)
RE:Kashmir versus India versus Pakistan
by Anusha R on Apr 10, 2007 10:17 AM Permalink
thanks for judging my comment..will joint english tution classes very soon. in case you could spare some time, will greatly appreciate it.
RE:Kashmir versus India versus Pakistan
by haresh rajkumar talreja on Apr 10, 2007 11:25 AM Permalink
Miss Anusha, you got good thinking, but half knowledge is very bad...let me tell you the reason for India not leaving kashmir alone...Kashmiri pandits being filterated for Kashmir is one reason...another reason is the strategic interests India has in Kashmir...all the rivers flowing into India and pakistan originate from himalayas in kashmir...Moreover Pakistan is not made of holy saints who are supporting for the cause of Kashmir...they too have got strategic interests(importantly water)...so when you talk India is spending lot of money for retaining Kashmir....there are serveral political, ethnic and strategic interests...people say there is nothing in siachin why is Indian army stationed there...again it has got strategic interests...the position where Indian army is stationed falls between the positions occupied by Pakistan army and chinese army....hence for militarily strategic reasons its very importantIndian army has to be stationed there...hence request you to pls gain enough knowledge then put comments...
