Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
rubbish
by bharat Maheshwari on Apr 08, 2007 04:25 PM   Permalink | Hide replies

what the rubbish Dr. Singh s talking about, if Judiciary is not there, PM and his class will sell our motherland and creat hovac.

Dr Singh it is time for you to know your limit, don't take people for a ride who has elected you. ( not Mrs. Gandhi).



    Forward  |  Report abuse
  RE:rubbish
by Sriram Vangal on Apr 08, 2007 04:28 PM   Permalink
MOst unfortunately, the ppl elected only Mrs. G.Since she was not acceptable to most of her supporting parties, MS was selected as the fall guy. I pity MS. OH. What a waste of talent and what a disgrace

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:rubbish
by Ajithkumar Kundapur on Apr 08, 2007 05:12 PM   Permalink
PM is correct.Judiciary is interfearing with govt day to day buisiness.
1.Delhi CNG case .Judiciary is directing.
Delhi Master plan, judiciary is directing
Delhi, polution level judiciary is directing.

but
Delay in pending cases, NO ACTION no DIRECTION, Not bothered

Y so meny polititions got scape through in courts?
not a single case is proved against polititions in court.
Is judiciary is corrupt?
Ayodya case is pending since 15 years
Boffors case is pending since 20 years.It will be taken up when some polititions tell them to open to counter some opposition party.
Is it correct by judiciary?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:rubbish
by Sriram Vangal on Apr 08, 2007 05:56 PM   Permalink
Please go thro the procedures of the court before commenting. In cases involving politicians, it is usually the prosecution meaning the police that screws up. No court can convict anybody on in sufficiant evidence. In case of Ayodhya, you will not get any judgement from any court in the world because it is not a legal question. Bofors is another classic example of screw up by the CBI

   Forward   |   Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
PM vs CJI on judiciary