Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
Shame on this guy
by Rajasekhar Chowdary on Apr 08, 2007 05:53 PM   Permalink | Hide replies

Who is this idiot to tell not to cross the limits to courts? When the governments are incapable of good governance then courts will come into picture. These idiot politicians are incapable that is why courts are giving such kind of rulings. I fully support supreme court rather than these sick governments and politicians.
I never expected these kind of words from our PM. Its a shame on him and time to review how he is ruling the country.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
  RE:Shame on this guy
by Vivek Thakur on Apr 08, 2007 06:03 PM   Permalink
Our PM should not forget that the member of Parliament, either from the Govt. or opposition, represent only a "fraction" of the citizens of India. Do they have rights to question judiciary ? All politicians should realize that that there are biases in our electoral procedure in Indian democracy. Thus the so-called representatives of people are not a TRUE representative.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Shame on this guy
by Idiot guy on Apr 08, 2007 06:07 PM   Permalink


Yes they represent 'fraction' of the citizens. But In a country having 800 languages, 450 subcastes, 10 religions, there will always be such.

MPs are representing their people in the high house of the parliament so that these 'fraction' of voices are heard at the high table, and helped.

If such little 'fractions' are not taken care of in their interests, this country will break up into 800 countries.

That's why only this system is keeping our country united sicne every and even tiny voices are heard, no matter how small.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Shame on this guy
by Idiot guy on Apr 08, 2007 05:55 PM   Permalink

Who are politicians ? The person who is chosen by the peoples in a constituency. He will always defend the interest of his constituency or the caste or the religion or whatever sub part he is representing.

Democracy is for the people = Peoples aspirations as reprsented by the MPs who will then formula laws to fulfills those aspirations.

And of course with such a diverse country it is nearly impossible to come to a consensus point or uniformity.


   Forward   |   Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
PM vs CJI on judiciary