1. Both support AFZAL and want to save him inspite of SUPREME COURT ORDERS. 2. Both claim that "MUSLIMS HAVE FIRST RIGHTS ON INDIAN RESOURCES" 3. Both are COMMUNAL elements dividing INDIANS on the basis of MUSLIM APPEASEMENT. 4. Both want to withdraw ARMY FROM J&K 5. Both want RESERVATIONS FOR MUSLIMS.
RE:SONIA and MULLAYAM are same
by jaison mulerickal on Apr 05, 2007 02:03 AM Permalink
please dont think so much communal.. every event should be judged on its own merits n demerits, not on the basis of religion.. india can never become a developed nation or peacefully contain all faiths, if we think always in communal basis.. thats a kind of escapism..
RE:SONIA and MULLAYAM are same
by abhijith m bharadwaj on Apr 05, 2007 04:48 AM Permalink
Yes jaison u r right when u say that every events shud be judged on its own merits and demerits. But why the hell is the government counting the number of "poor muslims" when they are supposed to count "poor indians" - don't read my definition of indians using ur political definition of secularism. When i say indian I mean any indian citizen and not based on his caste/ creed or religion. attempting to appease minority doesn't solve the problem of poverty, but it increases it. Its high time governments (I'm not talking of bull s*** political parties) start thinking of the welfare of an Indian, and not a religion / caste. I don't think either Sonia or mulayam can ever think of an Indian citizen without thinking of his religion or caste.
RE:SONIA and MULLAYAM are same
by Shahryar Pax on Apr 05, 2007 08:06 AM Permalink
Almost all countries in the civilized world can contain all faiths except Islam!
