we dont know what was the chat content was exactly... these volunteers could be the instigators,they could have logged onto chat with the aim of trapping indians(indian names and ids can easily be distinguished),they could have never told the indian guys that they were underaged....how can we come to a conclusion that the indians would have had sex with these minor girls??? if the authorities have valid answers/proof for these questions they can go to court and prove it instead of directly deporting them by forcefully making them sign on documents..
RE:the instigator?
by Silver Surfer on Oct 26, 2006 07:53 PM Permalink
From reading the site, Perverted Justice contributors have strict standards that must be followed. Foremost of those policies is that they never make first contact. The also never initiate talk of sex or first bring up the topic of meeting for sex.
The chat logs for those arrested will most likely not be available to the public until after the person is convicted as it is considered evidence. However, based on the chat logs from the 92 previous convictions that Perverted Justice has, the fact that these guys were arrested is almost a guarantee that they will be convicted.
Think logically, the police were there and willing to arrest these guys. The District Attorney's were most likely on board as well. Does anyone think for an instant that someone would have been arrested if they hadn't met all of the legal criteria to be arrested?
Merely having a sexual chat with someone you THINK is underage is illegal, nevermind actually showing up to follow through.
