I have gone through all the articles written by you in rediff. It is clear from it that you want to come in politics and want to use so called minority vote bank. You seems to be well educated, please don't try to devide the nation and stop writting such articals.
The wall around siddhivanayak is needed for safety of Mumbai and Mumbaikars.
A lawful action
by Azad on Oct 19, 2006 10:07 AM Permalink
The Siddhivinayak temple is located right abutting the twin forks at either side. This makes the whole place a very busy one at all times of the day. The devotees of the temple only add to the crowd. The devotees form the slow moving crowd around the temple, the small flower and puja material stalls further restricting the traffic movement. The wall is clearly an obstruction and it is only appropriate that it is removed to make space for pedestrian movement. The blatant encroachment has been rightly corrected and must be welcomed in public interest. Jai Hind
RE:Dear ONLY YOU need mental treatment !
by Ahimsa Anand on Oct 19, 2006 03:12 AM Permalink
If even demolishing a wall in public interest built around a temple is minority appeasement you are surely suffering from a "Minority Phobia"!!! It is people like you who are dividing the country on religious lines and not such write-ups. You advise yourself first and then come to others.
RE:Dear you need mental treatment
by mac on Oct 19, 2006 02:30 PM Permalink
I agree to this.. Sir, while I do agree that our courts do give sound and unbaised judgements tmie and again, I do not agree to the baised and irresponsible judgements you have given.. Why choosen these examples out of the countless we have where courts have been fair..
I would really like to know what you would say if at all there is indeed an attack on the sacred place and the security forces are not able to counter after the protection is removed.. Would you still complain..
Rediff editiors, do you edit and challenge irresponsible judgements from being published online ???
