There is just one thing that I cant understand that is why ISLAM is most unsecured religion. Its briefiengs are so good that if followed properly it just wont allow people to drift from it.
But the extremist and hardcore functionaries have turned islam to its current form only because they fear that ISLAM will one day may dsappear from the planet.
This is the belief while SIMI was founded. They saw the muslims in biased manner and wanted to uplift them. So I dont see the reason why & how SIMI drifted to its current position. It has the foundation on those believes. So, it just moved strongly in that direction (not drifted).
JUST A ONE FISH MAKES THE POND DIRTY. It is true in every sense. Now if any one says that the number of persons carrying the hardcore belief are very low they r simply covering the issue. They dont want to realize that those handful of people hv given a very poor image to all the muslims all over the world.
Why cant be there be a movement for upliftment of the humanity instead of just for the religion.
RE:SIMI, Islam etc
by kamini on Jul 14, 2006 08:35 PM Permalink
My dear friend, amit is right, Modi or any other hindu leader or member of any party related to hindu is not planning to destroy our country, they r always part of our country, but this OSAMA is not the planing for the well bieng of india. so there is a wast difference between Modi and Osama, dont u dare compare them.
RE:SIMI, Islam etc
by amit on Jul 15, 2006 06:24 PM Permalink
dear sandeepji if have little mind then u can easily get my point. have u ever been slapped by someone,what would be ur reaction and if someone rape ur dear one (like SIMI or Osama)then what would u do think and do reply u and other psuedo Hindu like Mulayam are fatal for the India.I pray to god that one day u and ur family become victim of these people jai hind
RE:SIMI, Islam etc
by drunti on Jul 16, 2006 09:56 AM Permalink
Mr. Sandeep,
I respect your sentiments. In the era of political and media jingosim its is rare to find people who think objectively.
I have been following closely all the News that is happening in the recent past.
we need to recognise as you rightly said a terrorist. There is no need to qualify a terrorist as either Hindu or Muslim or Christian or Sikh or Budhist or Jain. A terrorist is simply a terrorist. Infact even while reporting religion of a terrorist should not be referenced. He may be either in Pakistan, or in India (like Modi - the biggest Terrorist), USA, Canada, Saudi. There is no religion for terrorist.
The perpetrators of this gastly mumbai blasts were simply terrorists and unlawful, mercyless, inhuman people, not muslims, not hindus, or not of any other religion.
Infact media/leaders/common people telling that they are muslims is in itself an error in the first place. They should be dealt as criminals in the most stern way the law of the land tell. Associating these useless but dangerous people with religion is done simple to sensationalise to create chaos only to gain limited political or personal mileage.
