If the plot in question has been in the possession with police since 1920, how come the plot was being used as burila ground and was not objected by police all these years. Even if the plot was belonging to police, since it seems that the people were using it for burial purposes as is being claimed by the locals, the police should have talked it over with the locals regarding the misuse that their property was being subjected to, made them vacate their claim over the property and then gone ahead with the construction. In the manner they have gone ahead, they have surely played into the hands of people who look for such opportunities to create communal riots etc.,
RE:Bhiwandi riots,
by shyam on Jul 07, 2006 11:56 AM Permalink
Dear Ahmed / Kabir
But you have to consider this also that this is not the way of getting justice. You have courts and other peaceful ways also. Why it always started with violence u need to understand first, look around the world, understand it. Look around the world of all controversial places in the world what will be the common factor do u think this is just a co-incident. I know that Allah never in favored of violence. But these people are easily misguided by anti-social elements why that happened. U needs to think that also. All the people of world cannot be wrong.
You are right and I strongly agree to go by the law of the land.
But: What kind of response you expect from the police if they are attacked by a mob well-equiped with Swords, Chains, iron rods and stones from all sides? Do you want them to take the matter at that time to court?
If the place was alloted to Police in way back 1920 (as per the news in Mumbai Mirror, dtd 6th Jul 2006), then why didn't the interested group approached the solution by the law? Instead they took the law in their own hands? What does this reflects? Intolerance or dis-repsect in the law of the land one lives. Violence is generally carried out by a human being as a last resort. When there was the solution available by law, then why it was not tried? what does it reflects?
RE:Bhiwandi riots,
by bhupi on Jul 07, 2006 11:39 AM Permalink
Mr Ahmed, Lets face the facts-Ramjanamboomi,kashi cotroversies etc all are the legacies of the muslim invaders to this country.Their dustruction is an insult to all of us indian irrespective of the religious affiliation.But muslims in general and istigated by their so called leaders are not ready to accept the facts.Ayodhya and kashi belongs to all of us and it is our heritage.So lets all be ready to resolve it .The solutions to these is very easy if we wanted,just accept the facts.Godrastarted with the train burning and rest follows.Image the feeling of gujraties known for the tolerence going berseck.In the present case there can be no justification for murdering the police men on duty.They were doing their legtimate duty.The crime is of henieous nature,cann't go unpunished.All the incidents reflects the non tolerent tendecies on part of the community whatever be the reason.
RE:Bhiwandi riots,
by Sai Kumar on Jul 06, 2006 05:42 PM Permalink
Dear Siraj,
Can understand your pain. But at the same time we need to understand that not every human being is bad. There are fanatics both in your religion and in my religion as well. They play games and create such havoc.
The so called majority are definitely good at heart. One should appreciate that. But there are always exceptions... I/U agree. If the majority ever thinks of completely sidelining or eliminating so called minorities... will that ever make sense? Good's still hanging around. That's the reason both the religions still exist under one roof.
Some clerics in worship places unnessarily provoke young people and make them do the things, which are not acceptable to the mankind.
In the name of Muslim / Christian / Hindu - can kill each other? Rise. Understand. Act.
And now coming to the present scene at Mumbai... No one knows what really happened. Police blame Muslims for getting provoked and creating terror. Muslims say that it is police who's done this. Sound comes only when you clap with both hands. So in this case both Muslims and cops are at fault. Killings should not happen in the name of this man created stupid religions. Believe in brotherhood.
RE:Bhiwandi riots,
by Sirajuddin Ahmed on Jul 06, 2006 06:19 PM Permalink
terrorist BUT ALL TERRORISTS ARE MUSLIMS ONLY yes then i will define a Terrorist for you.
Some one fighting for a cause, Some one who dont fear for death for justice. If this is the definition of TERRORISTS then yes you are right. For Britishers Subhash Chand Bose was a terrorist but for we Indian he was a martyr a patriot.
You you who is TERRORISTS for us he is Hero. Then its just a matter of perspective. What needs to address is the root cause not the definition.
