why should the caste reservations continue. this is atrocity on the society. politians knew the past, no dynasty ruled india more than 2 to 3 decades by that itself 3 generations passed away. the than ruluers are tribes today. the reason who conquers the dynasty the past king run away with the folk to the forest and hide as a tribe. the people who came along with him as a small tribe they do lively hood by hunting & protecting the king family & their heriditory as their tribe leader. politicians knew the anthropology. communists knew only two castes exist in the world that is have\\\'s & have nots. but Nehru & Indira Gandhi only used the caste card for their survival in Indian politics & power. population verses the jobs is not sufficient to push one caste or creed. even ambedkar prophosised only reservations for down trodden in society only for 5 years. hence people should demand the politicians to stop in putting caste brand in the school registers. if the demand is not met the people should have one option to start beat politicians and bend them to the reality. no more reservation based on caste only reservation for economically backward
RE:caste reservation
by vijay on Jul 15, 2006 09:47 PM Permalink
dear mr param, bihar and up were ruled by brahmins/thakurs, such as mishras and tripathis till lalu and mulayam took over after 1990s till then it these two states were mosr backward of all bimaru states where these germs called brahmins r found in plenty, after mulayam and lalu took over they are still backward bcause the rot perpetuated by the earlier brahmin rulers is yet to b cleaned. if lalu is a dud then why IIM ahmedabad is learning from him how he made the railway coffers rich by over 10000/- crores. cntd..
RE:caste reservation
by vijay on Jul 16, 2006 01:14 AM Permalink
contd.. dear param, the comm which had concluded that the railways will never go out of red was headed by an UC, but lalu within one term made possible what no minister belonging to the so-called UC could do. brahmins and brahminism is dominant in bimaru states and their vicious domination has stiffled the growth of merit among the backward and marginalised section of society, wheares developed states from south and western india don't have brahmin domination and have rich history of social reforms. it is interesting to note that these states have systematically worked towards rescuing the socio-politico-economic spheres from the strangehold of brahmins and hence we witness overall prosperity in these states. its high time northern states also follow the pattern of southern and western indian states. regards
