Interesting article..! I agree with your views but there some points which I would like to make in context of your suggestion. Not necessarily to override your suggestions but the facts presented with different perspective. But there are few things of hinduism which one must understand. This religion is not about grouping people to follow a certain path by one leader. It was not built on philosophy of one person. And if you look back into its ethos you will realise that vedas and upanishads even though were against each other, they co-exist as part of hindu philosophy. Similarly different gurus can have different paths and certain people may follow certain. While the disunity can be looked as disadvantage, it is this disunity or I would say the democraticness within the religion which makes us democracy lovers. While British might have talked about constitution but the success of largest democracy comes from within (philosophy) of co-existence with contradictions.
