To make such serious headline grabbing allegation that can create huge uproar in such a sensitive area without any shread of proof or evidence is very unprofessional and childish behaviour by rediff. Upon reading the article very carefully, I could only gather that the author has a "feeling" that Advani could have walked into a trap laid by ISI, no details on why or how, let alone any solid proof. What does the author try to imply: Advani was drugged and therefore he was not in his own self when he made those comments or did Advani made those comments under some kind of threat from ISI? How can any man, in his own self, believe these comments to be some kind of a product of a trap by ISI? Come back to the real world, Mr. author!
