The article's aim seems to be more to criticize "unsecular" Hindutva-vaadis rather than to point out a glaring hole in the muslim personal law issue. The author says that there are satis, dowry deaths etc and I agree. But Hindus and Hindutva vaadis, unlike their Muslim counterparts are NOT defending satis etc by saying that they are valid according to some hindu texts. Legally they are banned and RSS strictly agrees with the banning of such draconian customs. RSS never said that some prophet has prescribed in his book that untouchability should be followed and hence the government should allow untouchability. So please dont compare RSS with Deobandis and show your logical reasoning incapabilities.
