Though I do not agree with some of the assertions made by the author, I agree with quite a few. He tries to draw a parallel between Islamists and Pakistan's ISI. If his definition of 'Islamist' is a religious muslim, I totally disagree with Rajeev. ISI and a religious muslim are diagonally opposite entities. ISI is an opportunistic entity which can go to any extreme for expanding Pakistan's borders. They do not care about helping the poor and needy muslims. On the other hand, a religious muslim gets ready to give away all his/her property and even life, for the sake of needy muslims. I do not agree with Rajeev when he uses the word Islamist again, for Britons or Pakistani orgin who have formed ghettos and create trouble there. They are anything but religious muslims. Having looked at these kind of people in India also, I can point out where the problem lies. It lies with the parents. Muslims give less importance to educating their children (both religious and regular education). They give enormous money to them and do not demand accountability from them. The rich youth draws poor muslim youth to them, with the money they have and collectively, they create problems in society.
