Rediff is a singularly anti-national forum which thrives on anti-Indianism and anti-Hinduism...all in the name of freedom of speech. For the money they rake in, they will sell the country and the people.
An article titled like this is so foolish and objectionable. If Indian does not need a nuclear bomb, it does not need an army, airforce or navy. What does it need them for.
What did India need independence. The British administration was quite good. There was very little corruption, and food was cheap. But why did Gandhi and Bose and thousand others wage a war for independence. Were they demented? What did India need Pokhran? Why does India need Kargill? Will it feed the poor.
Is it not plain stupidity. Rediff.com in the name of press freedom, is pushing itself to the limits. My question is Why does India need Rediff? How much money does rediff earn? How much money do they spend on wining and dining?
Its time legal action be taken against an antinational media like Rediff. They are frauds and misuse the freedom of press.
Re: rediff is anti national
by Onie on Sep 05, 2008 10:01 PM Permalink
chil yaar... I support the nuclear deal too. But I support it because it can defend India - an open, modern, liberal and democratic country that respects diversity and freedom of speech. If it started attacking every person with a differnce of opinion, India would not be India, it would become another Saudi Arabia. Then what use would be a nuclear bomb - we would have anyway lost this country.
Bolay to everyone is entitled to their opinion - tum kyon itna tension me par rahe ho
