if dravidians lived all across india before the so-called aryan invasion, why according to the author, the M130 gene marker is not found outside tamilnadu ? in states like MP, Maha, Gujrat , Chattisgadh, orissa, jharkhand there is a huge tribal and adivasi population. if they were truly of dravidian/african origin then they should have found the m130 marker in them,but they havent. so i reiterate that non aryan people of rest of india are not neccessarily dravidians/africans. they are indegenious people of non-aryan,non-dravidian race.dravidians belong only to south india.they never lived throughout india. it was a macaulean theory to divide and rule.
RE:Hmm interesting
by R A Sharma on Apr 30, 2008 10:22 AM Permalink
U r fully wrong. Do u mean to say the Muslims in north India later got converted to Hinduism?
RE:Hmm interesting
by Praveen George on Apr 30, 2008 09:10 AM Permalink
No point talking to these guys dude, i suggested that Modi could be of Baluchi/Iranian origin comparing his facial/physical features with Iranians, Baluchis and Afghanis. Any one who can identify racial descend would see that Modi is not Saurashtrian . People are just ignorant they just fight over relgion forgetting that many of the current day brahmin's ancestors could very vell be Persian
RE:RE:Hmm interesting
by venkat on Apr 30, 2008 09:59 AM Permalink
It was a poly by west and later by Politicians of Tamilnadu saying that Aryans came some where from West and defeated the people of India.
If Aryans came from the west, Aryans are nature worshippers , no where one would find nature worshippers in West.
Also there is no concensus from where Aryans came , some say they are from germany , Russia and some from Iran.
Instead Aryans would have gone to all those places from India
