PLEASE DO NOT COMPARE VIKRAM WITH FLOP ACTOR AJITH! THIS GUY SPOILT MOHANLAL'S CLASSIC "KIREEDOM" AND NOW HE IS GOING TO DO THE SAME WITH THIS FILM. HE IS GOING TO SPOIL THE NAME OF MR. BACHAN AND RAJNIKANTH BY ACTING IN THIS REMAKE! GOD SAVE US FROM AALWAR AJITH AND HIS FILMS!
RE:VIKRAM IS KING!
by Amoret on Dec 13, 2007 03:31 PM Permalink
No one can predict a movie. What do you think of the following Vikram movies - Samurai,Kadhal Sadugudu, King, Vinnukkum mannukkum and Youth(Telugu)? These movies are mega mega flop. Sethu was a starting point of success for Vikram. But for Ajith, its not case. People of Tamilnadu know him as a lover boy in his movie Paasa Malargal(featuring Arivand Swamy) itself. Also you know, that no one(people of this generation) has patient to sit and watch Mohanlal Kireedom now. It has to be filmed according to present situation. Compared to number of flop films, Vikram has given till now maximum number of flops :-) . Billa is definitely going to be a huge success, wait and see. Also if God want to save you from Alwar Ajith, please dont go and see any Ajith's movie, thats a better solution. By the way when is Bheema be releasing? For 2008 Pongal or 2018 Pongal?
RE:VIKRAM IS KING!
by arjun madhavan on Dec 14, 2007 09:01 AM Permalink
DUDE, AJIT HAS ONLY TWO CREDIBLE PERFORMANCES TILL DATE! VAALI AND VARALARU! PLEASE DO NOT COMPARE INDIAN TEAM TO AUSTRALIA, SIMILARLY DO NOT COMPARE AJIT TO VIKRAM, VIKRAM IS LEAGUES AHEAD....THOUGH HE MADE IT BIG LATE, HE ALREADY HAS ESTABLISHED AS THE ONE OF THE BEST "PERFORMERS" IN INDIA! ONE REQUEST TO AJIT N HIS FANS! DO NOT BE LIKE SREESANTH!! PLEASE SHOW UR PERFORMANCE AND THEN TALK, INSTEAD OF JUST TALKING AND DOING NOTHIN BUT GIVE FLOP AFTER FLOP!
RE:RE:VIKRAM IS KING!
by arjun madhavan on Dec 14, 2007 09:10 AM Permalink
HA HA...GUD JOKE! AND A FUNNY EXPLANATION! DUDE, AM NOT TALKIN ABOUT THE FILM, ITS A FLOP ANYWAYS, BUT I CAN UNDERSTAND IT BEING REMADE INTO TODAY'S SITUATION AND ALL! EVERYONE DOES THAT, BUT IT DOES NOT MEANT THAT U HAVE TO SPOIL A CLASSIC....AND AM TALKING ABOUT ACTORS, HIS PERFORMANCE IN THE FILM IS NOWHERE COMPARABLE TO EVEN SIMBU'S IN THE FILM...REMEMBER, MOHANLAL MISSED THE NATIONAL AWARD FOR THE SAME ROLE JUST BY 1 VOTE N THAT TOO TO MAMMOOTTY BECAUSE OF A MARGINALLY BETTER PERFORMANCE BY THE LATTER!
DUDE, AJIT HAS ONLY TWO CREDIBLE PERFORMANCES TILL DATE! VAALI AND VARALARU! PLEASE DO NOT COMPARE INDIAN TEAM TO AUSTRALIA, SIMILARLY DO NOT COMPARE AJIT TO VIKRAM, VIKRAM IS LEAGUES AHEAD....THOUGH HE MADE IT BIG LATE, HE ALREADY HAS ESTABLISHED AS THE ONE OF THE BEST "PERFORMERS" IN INDIA! ONE REQUEST TO AJIT N HIS FANS! DO NOT BE LIKE SREESANTH!! PLEASE SHOW UR PERFORMANCE AND THEN TALK, INSTEAD OF JUST TALKING AND DOING NOTHIN BUT GIVE FLOP AFTER FLOP!
RE:VIKRAM IS KING!
by vijay baskar on Dec 12, 2007 04:37 PM Permalink
Come on guys....
ajith is mass and vikram is class.. dont compare both... a superstar in TN needs mass more than his acting skills....do tell that vikram is next kamal we shall accept it... he cannot be next rajni... thats defn ajith or vijay i guess ajith suits more
RE:VIKRAM IS KING!
by Vikram on Dec 12, 2007 05:02 PM Permalink
In the beginning Ajith tried for Kamal's Successor, by acting films like Citizen i.e.changing the appearance. But it did'nt worked. So now he is trying for Rajini's place. Dear All, don't try to fill another's place. Try to create your own place. I think it is a tough fight between Ajith & Vijay like rajini & kamal. Their fans should not fight. They both are good actors,attracting peoples. Both are having different skills.
RE:RE:VIKRAM IS KING!
by Amoret on Dec 13, 2007 03:36 PM Permalink
If you follow the principles of some one, it doenst mean that you are trying to fill their place dude. Ajith never tried to become a Kamal or Rajni, he is juts following his principle. Dont write rubbish plz.
RE:VIKRAM IS KING!
by vijay ramaswamy on Dec 13, 2007 04:14 PM Permalink
Vijay is not next Rajiji He is (KI)ramarajan or Mike Mohan(Strero Type) ok SO next Super STar Is AJITH Only Dont compare with this type of category ok
