Ajith is not a good actor. He looks good and rather shd 've been in modeling industry. His voice modulation is horrible. And Rajini had been a good actor in the past. His role in Aval Appadithan is still for me the best he has done. But of late he has lost that color. I am not bothered if someone is a good natured man or helps someone, then he should be called a good social service person. Social service and being good to ppl are not the scales for good acting. So talk on someone who really acts well, like Mammootty, Mohan Lal, Kamal Hasan, Bharath, Jeeva, Pasupathi, Surya and not someone who spoils the field, in particular Vijay and Ajit. This is not meant to hurt anyone.
RE:Acting ???
by useless bollywood on Dec 10, 2007 07:02 PM Permalink
pls dont say ajith is better than rajni.. That superstar tag didnt come overnight to him. look at his acting in bhairavi,aarulindu arupathuvarai,raagavendra,mullum malarum. there r no styles in these movie, its just acting. everybody must have cried for mullum malarum climax. After billa,naan sigapu manithan he became a superstar and his fans wanted him to do action hero roles. fans just wanted him to be present on screen..thatz it..still i can say pedharayadu,baasha are also great movies..didnt ur hair raise during that rajni-anandraj fight in baasha? no actor can do that
RE:Acting ???
by prabakaran balasubramanium on Dec 10, 2007 06:44 PM Permalink
forget about ajith and his comedy(acting)-- just watch the curve of nayanu kutty
