WHAT WAS THE NECESSITY FOR HIM TO RE-MAKE IT? IS INDIAN FILM DERTH OF STORY? WHY IS AMITAB APPEARING IN THIS FILM. IS HE IN PLACE OF GABBAR? HE IS LOOSING HIS CREDIBILITY BY ACTING IN RE-MAKE FILMS? THERE SHOULD BE A LIMIT FOR MAKING MONEY. BUT HE SEEMS TO BE ONLY AFTER MONEY. HE OF LATE APPEARS IN ALL SUNDRY ADVT MOSTLY IRRELEVANT TO HIS STATURE. URMILAS APPEARANCE - LESS SAID THE BETTER. IN THE NUTSHELL, IT WILL BE DISASTEROUS DISSAPPOINT TO THE FRONT BENCHERS.
RE:RE:REMAKE OF SHOLAY
by rahul gaur on Aug 27, 2007 05:49 PM Permalink
Everyone has got the freedom and some innovative thinking to tell an old story in his own ways. just a small example why ramayana is told every year with some modifications at ramlila or in form of serials or movies right from the starting of bollywood era....
