The comparison between Rajanikanth and Amitabh is not fair. Amitabh Bachchan is not a famous and popular actor because he works in Marathi films. Rajanikanth is famous because of Tamil films. So if Rajani shows his allegiance to Tamilnadu, he may be right but Amitabh has no such compulsion to show allegiance to Marathi or Maharashtra.
RE:Amitabh Bachchan is not made famous by Marathi films
by umesh patil on Apr 08, 2008 03:13 PM Permalink
it is not related with the issue of in which industry he has working
RE:Amitabh Bachchan is not made famous by Marathi films
by amit saxena on Apr 08, 2008 03:15 PM Permalink
We should think of what he is doing for India(through movies which is his field not social work).Compare rajanikanth and Amitabh in hindi movies in which he also worked.Rajanikanth is not thinking of nation.Who knows Rajanikanth in World.Amitabh is known in world.He made a special place of Bollywood internationally.
RE:Amitabh Bachchan is not made famous by Marathi films
by bharat on Apr 08, 2008 03:16 PM Permalink
If Amitabh had stayed in Allahabad, would he have become what he is now, despite all his talent? Mumbai/Maharashtra, as his 'karmabhoomi' has played a lion's role in his gaining all his fame and money and it is his moral obligation to repay his karmabhoomi has given him, even if he may not have made money from Marathi films!
RE:Amitabh Bachchan is not made famous by Marathi films
by aoneall on Apr 08, 2008 03:33 PM Permalink
I already told you not to equate Mumbai with Maharashtra. Both are different things.
RE:Amitabh Bachchan is not made famous by Marathi films
by JNB on Apr 08, 2008 03:12 PM Permalink
Precisely!! Rajanikanth earns money from Tamil people. But Amitabh Bachchan and his movies earn money from all over India.
