Compare this case with Rizwanur Rahman case that shook Kolkata. There cannot be two yardsticks for two same cases. Kolkata Police Commissioner and two DCs were punished and transferred unceremoniously for intervening in the marriage of the consenting couple. Let the courts and people decide who is correct.
RE:Chiranjeevi's son-in-law involved in kidnap case
by govind dujari on Oct 18, 2007 11:14 PM Permalink
I will not be rude to you since you don't have your own mind to arrive at your own judgment. You are dependent upon the crutches of the media. The forensic report is yet to come. The CBI and the courts are yet to decide whether it was a murder or suicide. You people just hold the finger and walk. Try to storm your brain that the God has gifted you.
RE:Chiranjeevi's son-in-law involved in kidnap case
by govind dujari on Oct 18, 2007 11:24 PM Permalink
Would it have been the same had Priyanka Todi been the daughter of a billionaire Muslim tycoon and Rizwanur been a poor Hindu? Is a Muslim boy marrying a Hindu girl and a Hindu boy marrying a Muslim girl the same? Have you not heard about honour killings? Did police not do the right thing by sending Priyanka to her parents for some time to take stock of the situation and to eliminate the chance of any bodily harm?
RE:Chiranjeevi's son-in-law involved in kidnap case
by Minto on Oct 18, 2007 10:29 PM Permalink
These things happen all the time. Rizwanur got special treatment because of his minority status.
RE:Chiranjeevi's son-in-law involved in kidnap case
by Reeya Verghese on Oct 18, 2007 11:15 PM Permalink
Dont be such an insensitive person. We are talking of murder, minority or otherwise by the police. It could happen to anybody.
RE:Chiranjeevi's son-in-law involved in kidnap case
by Minto on Oct 19, 2007 12:28 AM Permalink
Reyaa, Do not be naive. They always get special treatment. Do you remeber Sohrabuddin fiasco? How bold and competent police officer had to suffer for protecting public safety.
