>> The middle path proposed is to retain 600 acres as required solely by tata motors to be there where it is, remaining 400 acres required for ancillary units to be moved to few km away in a low lying land which is not as fertile.
Yeah right. LOL! If you move the plant a few km away then the people there will start protesting that you are taking the most fertile agricultural land in the world.
You talk about ethics. Is it ethical for people to violently attack other people in the name of protest? To destroy property, to deny people their livelihood by using intimidation and violence as Mamata is doing?
Re: @Sengupta
by Sushma Sengupta on Sep 03, 2008 12:10 AM Permalink
i do not support Mamata,her methods are wrong but she does have a valid point.I repeat i am against Violence and i do not indulge in politics.I have addressed Tata as 'Ratanji' i dont have personal issues but fact is fact it cant be disorted to please some section ( industralist's ego)
Re: @Sengupta
by AdfauunhAjrqQOmjh on Sep 03, 2008 12:13 AM Permalink
Hi Sushmaji. You suck big time. *literally* :). Note, I have addressed you as Sushmaji.
