Re: Re: Nano should be banned
by sreedhar reddy on Sep 03, 2008 01:24 PM Permalink
with jaguar, tata can compete with any top car maker, but he decided to make this cheap car for loosers like you
Re: Re: Re: Nano should be banned
by Ajay on Sep 03, 2008 01:32 PM Permalink
jaguar was in huge loss...and as expected TATA took over this cheap but 'famous' old car..it cant compete with new cars..wake up... and comon, dont call me a looser, because im not :)
Re: Re: Re: Re: Nano should be banned
by BharatDesh on Sep 03, 2008 01:37 PM Permalink
Yes jaguar is loosing money....but u convenoently forgot Land rover which is the most profitable one among Ford's stables...by the by i want to buy jaguar. can u tell me where it is cheap...
Re: Nano should be banned
by kamal on Sep 03, 2008 01:33 PM Permalink
Hey Sreedhar..what Ajay said is true...we dont have parking facilities even to keep motorcycles in cities where the hell any one can park this nano ...nano is rubbish from the beginning..if Tata had atleast had an idea of environmental problems he is going to get with he should not have started it. Nano's design is excellent except to its engine which runs on fuel tatas should have used natural gas or electricity for this purpose..to make this car environmentally friendly...and more over..every one has to look into long term problems that it is going to get..along with the short term happiness of driving a car!!!!!! for many indians.
Re: Re: Nano should be banned
by Ajay on Sep 03, 2008 01:29 PM Permalink
ofcourse i care because i pay road tax to ride on road. such influx of low quality cars will not only worsen traffic, but increase number of accidents too...you will hear news of accidents of nano everyday!!
Re: Re: Re: Nano should be banned
by BharatDesh on Sep 03, 2008 01:34 PM Permalink
whethe nano comes or not......influx of cars is going to happen...so instead of blaming others...ur city government is better of in creating more infrastructure...that is the solution...stopping nano is not...
