This is the only reason why ISB is more lucrative to students than IIMs. ISB has many international faculties who are paid handsomely. Their curriculum hs more practical approach to industry than IIMs. In short, ISB produces those management graduates that are comparable to those from elites like Harvard, Stanford, Wharton etc. "IIMs produces just bookworms, they dont teach students how to cope up with failures " .. once said by Steve Balmer, I agree wth him thorougly ...
RE:ISB vs IIM
by subash bose on Jul 16, 2008 09:34 AM Permalink
It is ranked 20th in world by FT (Financial times). No IIM figures in the top 100 list.
RE:ISB vs IIM
by swamy on Jul 16, 2008 10:09 AM Permalink
dude, if u really thought IIM grads were being paid to use their IIM gyan, u need to get a reality check. They are recruited because they cleared CAT, and no ISB cleared CAT, and so they will always be 2nd tier
RE:ISB vs IIM
by shit on Jul 16, 2008 10:23 AM Permalink
Lol .. GMAT is wht is required to crack ISBs .. u cant get into ISB without crossing 700 , also GDs n PIs which r acid tests ... nw plz dont ask here in blog .. " wht is GMAT?" ... besides, acc to FT : ISB is ranked 20th in world's best management institutes where IIMS r not even in top 100s , as pointed out by subhash bose .. global ranking decides who is best .. not "U" ...
RE:ISB vs IIM
by swamy on Jul 16, 2008 11:14 AM Permalink
oh really, then why does ISB not attract the best companies? Only Mck goes because they started the place, apart from that its only Indian cos. Global rankings are based on research carried out, not its value to MBA students. As far as research in Business is concerned, ISB is certainly better
RE:ISB vs IIM
by shit on Jul 16, 2008 10:00 AM Permalink
half knowledge is alwez dangerous ... so plz comment only after u r eligible to write the blog dude ...
