THERE IS CHINESE UNITY WHEREAS IN MUMBAI FELLOW INDIANS ARE BEATEN UP AND THREATNED UNDER THE AGIS OF DEMOCRACY. THERE IS NO SHIV SENA AND MNS. IN SHANGHAI THERE ARE NO PERSONS LIKE BAL THACKERAY AND HIS CROONIES WHO THREATEN FELLOW INDIANS NO RAJ THACKERAY . IN SHORT WE ARE CHINESE FIRST THEN EVERYTHING ELESE IN INDIA WE ARE SO AND SO FIRST AND THEN MAY BE INDIANS. "DISUNITY IN DIVERSITY"
RE:MANY DIFFERENCES BETWEEN SHANGHAI AND MUMBAI
by Ashish Kanekar on Apr 05, 2008 10:26 PM Permalink
Hey all migrant supporters - where do you think the water comes to support millions of migrants coming from Bihar/UP into Maharashtra? The constitution is their defense - but the constitution cannot provide the water!!!
The water is Maharashtra water supply with dams built in the state and pumped through large pipes to a city like Mumbai.
Water is finite - and for every one excess migrant in Maharashtra, there is less water for the state residents. So will your constitution create water from nowhere Rest of India?
RE:MANY DIFFERENCES BETWEEN SHANGHAI AND MUMBAI
by raj on Apr 06, 2008 11:26 AM Permalink
yu have a pointless argument. maharastra is not a country, its a state. maharastrians dont create water, they have only created dams. the resource is a national resource. maharastrians dont have a first right to it.
