It is pleasant to read one of the thoughtful articles by a resident Indian of action, and in Indian media. However the two views are not the only ones. When British colonized India, they used the marxist laws to imply that it was the destiny of progress, the Indians needed to be civillized by colonialization. For that they used barbaric ideas that has uprooted understandings in continents. It is still used by many intellectuals ( including its followers in rediff, ex: S Bhat) to justify naxalism and terrorism when hindus suffer. Their purpouse is to deny the Indian civillization by interprating it in modern language. Enlightnment is attrubuted to brits and english!
So, the enterprenuers could be midwives of a process, but that has important question, as the article asks - what makes one better enterprenuer. Other questions being when it is better, what is better, when better is conisidered is a better, what else is the enterprenuer , how else to see all these disparate questions etc. These may show (who knows) that the midwife of a process is an individual too, as we percieve.
The pseudo specialists of the process, from JNU or agents of China, may lose no time in explaining this such as to make the enterprenuer a capitalist agent, not even midwife. An evangalist of capital would do that, as would other evangalists. if they suceed, they create an ideal world where A dumb one like Marx, or a thug like Mao, then becomes the intelligent phenomena. Its followers are considered better. Obviously thugs like Mao has an honourable space for the maoists or chinese, but I disagree when they put it in terms of the intelligent phenomena. Thats why I like the question on which one is a better enterprenuer. I dislike the answer from auto industry, for the process visible in auto industry could be contextual, applicable when purpose and context is simillar.
There were miscllenious thoughts which was not about capital generation or gains. I don't know what is the purpose of writing the above, but irrespective of that, let me thank for the excellent article.
