I am neither a pilot or an avionics expert but here are my thoughts regarding this matter and I was hoping to get some feedback and start a debate. 1. Considering that the US airforce hasn't used the F-16 for about 4 years and that even the air national guard is in the process of retiring these aircraft from service leads me to believe that it is a fairly outdated Jet.
2. The F-18 Super Hornets (albeit great jets) cost about $10 million more than Su-30s. Considering our pilots have a longer history with Russian systems I wonder if it's a good idea to introduce a brand new platform into the IAF. Maybe someone with flight experience could shed some light on the training process related difficulties regarding this matter. I have always felt that the pilot's competency out weighed the capabilities of the machine itself. The example of the Israeli pilots running circles around the more superior arab Migs in the 67,72 and 81 wars comes to mind. 3. We already have manufacturing licenses for Russian systems. Why aren't we using those to create indigenous versions suited to our needs like the way the Israelis have done with the F-15s and F-16s?
4. I think HAL needs a swift kick in the pants. They have been faltering on their LCA program especially due to the Kaveri debacle and haven't even started with the MCA program. IMHO the aeronautical industry needs to be de-centralized and privatized. I bet there would be atleast 4-5 companies that would spring up creating a more competitive environment resulting in better products. Don't get me wrong, I'm happy about all the work HAL has done and the valuable lessons this process has brought about, I just think the Indian Aeronautical complex could be a lot more efficient and cutting edge like all the other high tech private sector players.
Lastly, I can't believe people are saying that the F-16 fighting falcons or the F18 super hornets are comparable to the F-22 Raptor. The Raptor is about 3-4 generations ahead of the F-16. It has stealth capabilities and one hell of a missile arsenal, the fact that the USAF now wants to replace the raptors with the F-35 is simply mind boggling.. of course this will never be for sale as long as the US holds the lead on Stealth Technology.
RE:Lets get a debate started.
by apjunkmail on Feb 09, 2007 02:01 AM Permalink
India needs technology transfer not licensed assembly factored into the new planes they buy to replace the Mig21s. If they could run with Mig21s till now , I think whatever they get will stay for next 20 -25 years or so. However technology frog leap is needed, not incremental progress on whatever frontline fighters they get. It must incorporate stealth and all latest avionics. Off course no one will agree to technology transfer for that. I agree about involving companies like Tata to facilitate technology transfer with deadlines and disciplined operation in production. Patriotic factor kept in mind stringent rules are need to be developed to keep espionage . Stay away from Haliburton type super chor model like plague.
RE:RE:Lets get a debate started.
by Pankajkumar Raval on Feb 09, 2007 08:17 AM Permalink
You are absolutely right.When are capable to make Cryogenic engine,Param computer and many more why not a latest version of Indegenus fighter plane.I think that our aeronautical department should refer chapter "Yantrasarvasva" in Holybook "Bhrugusamhita".Any Aironautical concept May not be latest than it.Yes,question of breaking Mig-21 & loosing valuable properties in term of young Pilot,but it should be researched,Purchasing F-16 or F-18 is not a solution of technology upgradation.Yes,on Ratan TATA,no doubt he is Ratan of Bharat,who started to ruled over Britisher.
